From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756018AbcBIBBo (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:01:44 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com ([209.85.215.68]:34069 "EHLO mail-lf0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912AbcBIBBl (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:01:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B93548.9090006@linaro.org> References: <3071836.JbNxX8hU6x@vostro.rjw.lan> <18671470.kF8gVcBlTg@vostro.rjw.lan> <6398636.DlBgLvxltE@vostro.rjw.lan> <56B93548.9090006@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:01:39 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5JF8s9uZGHeCp-V_pN5ci0I9yuc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Steve Muckle , Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Juri Lelli , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Steve Muckle wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to >> put this series into linux-next. >> >> There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for >> bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on >> this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so >> there really isn't more time to wait. > > Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and > really just got to look at this today. > > One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in > CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL > task activity? I don't think they may be completely stalled, but I'd prefer Peter to answer that as he suggested to do it this way. Peter?