* [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
@ 2021-04-02 9:30 Xie He
2021-04-05 19:34 ` Xie He
2021-04-06 23:14 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xie He @ 2021-04-02 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schiller, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jonathan Corbet,
Krzysztof Halasa, linux-x25, netdev, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Cc: Xie He
X.25 Layer 3 (the Packet Layer) expects layer 2 to provide a reliable
datalink service such that no packets are reordered or dropped. And
X.25 Layer 2 (the LAPB layer) is indeed designed to provide such service.
However, this reliability is not preserved when a driver calls "netif_rx"
to deliver the received packets to layer 3, because "netif_rx" will put
the packets into per-CPU queues before they are delivered to layer 3.
If there are multiple CPUs, the order of the packets may not be preserved.
The per-CPU queues may also drop packets if there are too many.
Therefore, we should not call "netif_rx" to let it queue the packets.
Instead, we should use our own queue that won't reorder or drop packets.
This patch changes all X.25 drivers to use their own queues instead of
calling "netif_rx". The patch also documents this requirement in the
"x25-iface" documentation.
Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
---
Change from v4 to v5:
Break a line that exceeds 80 characters.
Change from v1 to v4:
Add the "__GFP_NOMEMALLOC" flag to "dev_alloc_skb" calls, to prevent
pfmemalloc skbs from occurring.
(Changes in v2 and v3 are no longer present in v4.)
Change from RFC to v1:
Rebase onto the latest net-next.
---
Documentation/networking/x25-iface.rst | 65 ++++----------------------
drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c | 30 ++++++++++--
drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/x25-iface.rst b/Documentation/networking/x25-iface.rst
index df401891dce6..f34e9ec64937 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/x25-iface.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/x25-iface.rst
@@ -70,60 +70,13 @@ First Byte = 0x03 (X25_IFACE_PARAMS)
LAPB parameters. To be defined.
+Requirements for the device driver
+----------------------------------
-Possible Problems
-=================
-
-(Henner Eisen, 2000-10-28)
-
-The X.25 packet layer protocol depends on a reliable datalink service.
-The LAPB protocol provides such reliable service. But this reliability
-is not preserved by the Linux network device driver interface:
-
-- With Linux 2.4.x (and above) SMP kernels, packet ordering is not
- preserved. Even if a device driver calls netif_rx(skb1) and later
- netif_rx(skb2), skb2 might be delivered to the network layer
- earlier that skb1.
-- Data passed upstream by means of netif_rx() might be dropped by the
- kernel if the backlog queue is congested.
-
-The X.25 packet layer protocol will detect this and reset the virtual
-call in question. But many upper layer protocols are not designed to
-handle such N-Reset events gracefully. And frequent N-Reset events
-will always degrade performance.
-
-Thus, driver authors should make netif_rx() as reliable as possible:
-
-SMP re-ordering will not occur if the driver's interrupt handler is
-always executed on the same CPU. Thus,
-
-- Driver authors should use irq affinity for the interrupt handler.
-
-The probability of packet loss due to backlog congestion can be
-reduced by the following measures or a combination thereof:
-
-(1) Drivers for kernel versions 2.4.x and above should always check the
- return value of netif_rx(). If it returns NET_RX_DROP, the
- driver's LAPB protocol must not confirm reception of the frame
- to the peer.
- This will reliably suppress packet loss. The LAPB protocol will
- automatically cause the peer to re-transmit the dropped packet
- later.
- The lapb module interface was modified to support this. Its
- data_indication() method should now transparently pass the
- netif_rx() return value to the (lapb module) caller.
-(2) Drivers for kernel versions 2.2.x should always check the global
- variable netdev_dropping when a new frame is received. The driver
- should only call netif_rx() if netdev_dropping is zero. Otherwise
- the driver should not confirm delivery of the frame and drop it.
- Alternatively, the driver can queue the frame internally and call
- netif_rx() later when netif_dropping is 0 again. In that case, delivery
- confirmation should also be deferred such that the internal queue
- cannot grow to much.
- This will not reliably avoid packet loss, but the probability
- of packet loss in netif_rx() path will be significantly reduced.
-(3) Additionally, driver authors might consider to support
- CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL. This allows the driver to be woken up
- when a previously congested backlog queue becomes empty again.
- The driver could uses this for flow-controlling the peer by means
- of the LAPB protocol's flow-control service.
+Packets should not be reordered or dropped when delivering between the
+Packet Layer and the device driver.
+
+To avoid packets from being reordered or dropped when delivering from
+the device driver to the Packet Layer, the device driver should not
+call "netif_rx" to deliver the received packets. Instead, it should
+call "netif_receive_skb_core" from softirq context to deliver them.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
index 5a6a945f6c81..ba8c36c7ea91 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct x25_state {
x25_hdlc_proto settings;
bool up;
spinlock_t up_lock; /* Protects "up" */
+ struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
+ struct tasklet_struct rx_tasklet;
};
static int x25_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr);
@@ -34,14 +36,27 @@ static struct x25_state *state(hdlc_device *hdlc)
return hdlc->state;
}
+static void x25_rx_queue_kick(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ struct x25_state *x25st = from_tasklet(x25st, t, rx_tasklet);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = skb_dequeue(&x25st->rx_queue);
+
+ while (skb) {
+ netif_receive_skb_core(skb);
+ skb = skb_dequeue(&x25st->rx_queue);
+ }
+}
+
/* These functions are callbacks called by LAPB layer */
static void x25_connect_disconnect(struct net_device *dev, int reason, int code)
{
+ struct x25_state *x25st = state(dev_to_hdlc(dev));
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned char *ptr;
- if ((skb = dev_alloc_skb(1)) == NULL) {
+ skb = __dev_alloc_skb(1, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ if (!skb) {
netdev_err(dev, "out of memory\n");
return;
}
@@ -50,7 +65,9 @@ static void x25_connect_disconnect(struct net_device *dev, int reason, int code)
*ptr = code;
skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+
+ skb_queue_tail(&x25st->rx_queue, skb);
+ tasklet_schedule(&x25st->rx_tasklet);
}
@@ -71,6 +88,7 @@ static void x25_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, int reason)
static int x25_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ struct x25_state *x25st = state(dev_to_hdlc(dev));
unsigned char *ptr;
if (skb_cow(skb, 1)) {
@@ -84,7 +102,10 @@ static int x25_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
*ptr = X25_IFACE_DATA;
skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
- return netif_rx(skb);
+
+ skb_queue_tail(&x25st->rx_queue, skb);
+ tasklet_schedule(&x25st->rx_tasklet);
+ return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -223,6 +244,7 @@ static void x25_close(struct net_device *dev)
spin_unlock_bh(&x25st->up_lock);
lapb_unregister(dev);
+ tasklet_kill(&x25st->rx_tasklet);
}
@@ -338,6 +360,8 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr)
memcpy(&state(hdlc)->settings, &new_settings, size);
state(hdlc)->up = false;
spin_lock_init(&state(hdlc)->up_lock);
+ skb_queue_head_init(&state(hdlc)->rx_queue);
+ tasklet_setup(&state(hdlc)->rx_tasklet, x25_rx_queue_kick);
/* There's no header_ops so hard_header_len should be 0. */
dev->hard_header_len = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
index 45d74285265a..59646865a3a4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct lapbethdev {
struct net_device *axdev; /* lapbeth device (lapb#) */
bool up;
spinlock_t up_lock; /* Protects "up" */
+ struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
+ struct napi_struct napi;
};
static LIST_HEAD(lapbeth_devices);
@@ -83,6 +85,26 @@ static __inline__ int dev_is_ethdev(struct net_device *dev)
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
+static int lapbeth_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
+{
+ struct lapbethdev *lapbeth = container_of(napi, struct lapbethdev,
+ napi);
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ int processed = 0;
+
+ for (; processed < budget; ++processed) {
+ skb = skb_dequeue(&lapbeth->rx_queue);
+ if (!skb)
+ break;
+ netif_receive_skb_core(skb);
+ }
+
+ if (processed < budget)
+ napi_complete(napi);
+
+ return processed;
+}
+
/*
* Receive a LAPB frame via an ethernet interface.
*/
@@ -135,6 +157,7 @@ static int lapbeth_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packe
static int lapbeth_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ struct lapbethdev *lapbeth = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned char *ptr;
if (skb_cow(skb, 1)) {
@@ -148,7 +171,10 @@ static int lapbeth_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
*ptr = X25_IFACE_DATA;
skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
- return netif_rx(skb);
+
+ skb_queue_tail(&lapbeth->rx_queue, skb);
+ napi_schedule(&lapbeth->napi);
+ return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
}
/*
@@ -233,8 +259,9 @@ static void lapbeth_data_transmit(struct net_device *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void lapbeth_connected(struct net_device *dev, int reason)
{
+ struct lapbethdev *lapbeth = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned char *ptr;
- struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(1);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = __dev_alloc_skb(1, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
if (!skb) {
pr_err("out of memory\n");
@@ -245,13 +272,16 @@ static void lapbeth_connected(struct net_device *dev, int reason)
*ptr = X25_IFACE_CONNECT;
skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+
+ skb_queue_tail(&lapbeth->rx_queue, skb);
+ napi_schedule(&lapbeth->napi);
}
static void lapbeth_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, int reason)
{
+ struct lapbethdev *lapbeth = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned char *ptr;
- struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(1);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = __dev_alloc_skb(1, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
if (!skb) {
pr_err("out of memory\n");
@@ -262,7 +292,9 @@ static void lapbeth_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, int reason)
*ptr = X25_IFACE_DISCONNECT;
skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+
+ skb_queue_tail(&lapbeth->rx_queue, skb);
+ napi_schedule(&lapbeth->napi);
}
/*
@@ -293,6 +325,8 @@ static int lapbeth_open(struct net_device *dev)
struct lapbethdev *lapbeth = netdev_priv(dev);
int err;
+ napi_enable(&lapbeth->napi);
+
if ((err = lapb_register(dev, &lapbeth_callbacks)) != LAPB_OK) {
pr_err("lapb_register error: %d\n", err);
return -ENODEV;
@@ -317,6 +351,8 @@ static int lapbeth_close(struct net_device *dev)
if ((err = lapb_unregister(dev)) != LAPB_OK)
pr_err("lapb_unregister error: %d\n", err);
+ napi_disable(&lapbeth->napi);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -374,6 +410,9 @@ static int lapbeth_new_device(struct net_device *dev)
lapbeth->up = false;
spin_lock_init(&lapbeth->up_lock);
+ skb_queue_head_init(&lapbeth->rx_queue);
+ netif_napi_add(ndev, &lapbeth->napi, lapbeth_napi_poll, 16);
+
rc = -EIO;
if (register_netdevice(ndev))
goto fail;
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
2021-04-02 9:30 [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues Xie He
@ 2021-04-05 19:34 ` Xie He
2021-04-06 6:17 ` Martin Schiller
2021-04-06 23:14 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xie He @ 2021-04-05 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schiller, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jonathan Corbet,
Krzysztof Halasa, Linux X25, Linux Kernel Network Developers,
linux-doc, LKML
Hi Martin,
Could you ack? Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
2021-04-05 19:34 ` Xie He
@ 2021-04-06 6:17 ` Martin Schiller
2021-04-06 8:49 ` Xie He
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schiller @ 2021-04-06 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xie He
Cc: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jonathan Corbet,
Krzysztof Halasa, Linux X25, Linux Kernel Network Developers,
linux-doc, LKML
On 2021-04-05 21:34, Xie He wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Could you ack? Thanks!
Acked-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Just for the record: I'm certainly not always the fastest,
but I don't work holidays or weekends. So you also need to have some
patience.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
2021-04-06 6:17 ` Martin Schiller
@ 2021-04-06 8:49 ` Xie He
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xie He @ 2021-04-06 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schiller
Cc: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jonathan Corbet,
Krzysztof Halasa, Linux X25, Linux Kernel Network Developers,
linux-doc, LKML
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de> wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
>
> Just for the record: I'm certainly not always the fastest,
> but I don't work holidays or weekends. So you also need to have some
> patience.
Oh. Thank you! Sorry, I didn't know there was a holiday in Germany.
Happy holiday! :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
2021-04-02 9:30 [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues Xie He
2021-04-05 19:34 ` Xie He
@ 2021-04-06 23:14 ` David Miller
2021-04-06 23:55 ` Xie He
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2021-04-06 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xie.he.0141
Cc: ms, kuba, corbet, khc, linux-x25, netdev, linux-doc, linux-kernel
From: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 02:30:00 -0700
> X.25 Layer 3 (the Packet Layer) expects layer 2 to provide a reliable
> datalink service such that no packets are reordered or dropped. And
> X.25 Layer 2 (the LAPB layer) is indeed designed to provide such service.
>
> However, this reliability is not preserved when a driver calls "netif_rx"
> to deliver the received packets to layer 3, because "netif_rx" will put
> the packets into per-CPU queues before they are delivered to layer 3.
> If there are multiple CPUs, the order of the packets may not be preserved.
> The per-CPU queues may also drop packets if there are too many.
>
> Therefore, we should not call "netif_rx" to let it queue the packets.
> Instead, we should use our own queue that won't reorder or drop packets.
>
> This patch changes all X.25 drivers to use their own queues instead of
> calling "netif_rx". The patch also documents this requirement in the
> "x25-iface" documentation.
>
> Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
This no longe applies to net-next, please respin.
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues
2021-04-06 23:14 ` David Miller
@ 2021-04-06 23:55 ` Xie He
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xie He @ 2021-04-06 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: Martin Schiller, Jakub Kicinski, Jonathan Corbet,
Krzysztof Halasa, Linux X25, Linux Kernel Network Developers,
linux-doc, LKML
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:14 PM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> This no longe applies to net-next, please respin.
Oh. I see this has already been applied to net-next. Thank you!
There's no need to apply again.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-06 23:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-02 9:30 [PATCH net-next v5] net: x25: Queue received packets in the drivers instead of per-CPU queues Xie He
2021-04-05 19:34 ` Xie He
2021-04-06 6:17 ` Martin Schiller
2021-04-06 8:49 ` Xie He
2021-04-06 23:14 ` David Miller
2021-04-06 23:55 ` Xie He
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).