From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9850EC433ED for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8F5613AE for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345129AbhDFOXn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:23:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232556AbhDFOXj (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:23:39 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A3BC06174A; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 07:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lTmc4-0037of-6y; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:23:28 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:23:28 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Christian Brauner Cc: Jens Axboe , syzbot , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in mntput_no_expire (2) Message-ID: References: <20210405170801.zrdhnon6g4ggb6c7@wittgenstein> <20210405200737.qurhkqitoxweousx@wittgenstein> <20210406123505.auxqtquoys6xg6yf@wittgenstein> <20210406132205.qnherkzif64xmgxg@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:15:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > I'm referring to the fact that your diff is with an already modified path_lookupat() > _and_ those modifications have managed to introduce a bug your patch reverts. > No terminate_walk() paired with that path_init() failure, i.e. path_init() is > responsible for cleanups on its (many) failure exits... I can't tell without seeing the variant your diff is against, but at a guess it had a non-trivial amount of trouble with missed rcu_read_unlock() in cases when path_init() fails after having done rcu_read_lock(). For trivial testcase, consider passing -1 for dfd, so that it would fail with -EBADF. Or passing 0 for dfd and "blah" for name (assuming your stdin is not a directory). Sure, you could handle those in path_init() (or delay grabbing rcu_read_lock() in there, spreading it in a bunch of branches), but duplicated cleanup logics for a bunch of failure exits is asking for trouble.