From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932803AbcBIUAV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:00:21 -0500 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:27099 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932149AbcBIUAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:00:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:44:08 +0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Daniel Wagner CC: kbuild test robot , , Ralf Baechle , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mips: Differentiate between 32 and 64 bit ELF header In-Reply-To: <56B9DDCA.3000700@bmw-carit.de> Message-ID: References: <201602090033.mukhdG4N%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56B99D55.2020301@bmw-carit.de> <56B9DDCA.3000700@bmw-carit.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [10.100.200.149] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > FWIW I think all the MIPS ABI flags stuff also needs to go outside the > > conditional, because it's ABI agnostic. I'll make the right change myself > > on top of your fixes. It'll remove a little bit of code duplication, > > which is always welcome. > > Great, thanks for taking care of it. My ABI flags change has passed testing and I'm ready to post it, will you be respinning your patch soon? Maciej