lkmm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	parri.andrea@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
	dlustig@nvidia.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	quic_neeraju@quicinc.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkmm@lists.linux.dev,
	hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] tools/memory-model: Rule out OOTA
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:39:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4411cf20-f889-4fd7-9e03-14744deaaf72@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446d6a64-7ee4-494a-bbfe-dbfdb6959f9c@huaweicloud.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:28:06PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 1/16/2025 um 7:40 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > 	o	If a value is read in the seqlock reader and used
> > 		across a "you need to retry" indication, that
> > 		flags a seqlock data race.
> 
> 
> This too is insufficient, you also need to prevent dereferencing or having
> control dependency inside the seqlock. Otherwise you could derefence a torn
> pointer and...

True, but isn't that prohibition separable from the underlying
implementation?

> At this point your definition of data race becomes pretty much the same as
> we have.
> 
> https://github.com/open-s4c/libvsync/blob/main/vmm/vmm.cat#L150
> 
> 
> (also this rule should only concern reads that are actually "data-racy" - if
> the read is synchronized by some other writes, then you can read & use it
> just fine across the seqlock data race)

Perhaps LKMM should adopt this or something similar, but what do others
think?

> I also noticed that in my previous e-mail I had overlooked the reads inside
> the CS in the failure case, but you are of course right, there needs to be
> some mechanism to prevent them from being data racy unless abused.
> 
> But I am not sure how to formalize that in a way that is simpler than just
> re-defining data races in general, without adding some special support to
> herd7 for it.
> 
> What do you think?

I was thinking in terms of identifying reads in critical sections (sort
of like LKMM does for RCU read-side critical sections), then identifying
any dependencies from those reads that cross a failed reader boundary.
If that set is non-empty, flag it.

But I clearly cannot claim to have thought this through.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06 21:40 [RFC] tools/memory-model: Rule out OOTA Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-07 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 11:02   ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-07 15:46 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-07 16:09 ` Alan Stern
2025-01-07 18:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-08 17:39     ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-08 18:09       ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-08 19:17         ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-09 17:54           ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-09 18:35             ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-10 14:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-10 16:21                 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-13 22:04                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 18:40                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 19:13                       ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-16 19:31                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:21                           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-16 19:28                       ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-16 19:39                         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-01-17 12:08                           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-16 19:08                     ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-16 23:02                       ` Alan Stern
2025-01-17  8:34                         ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
2025-01-17 11:29                         ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-17 20:01                           ` Alan Stern
2025-01-21 10:36                             ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-21 16:39                               ` Alan Stern
2025-01-22  3:46                                 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-22 19:11                                   ` Alan Stern
2025-01-17 15:52                         ` Alan Stern
2025-01-17 16:45                           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-17 19:02                             ` Alan Stern
2025-01-09 20:37             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-09 21:13               ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-08 17:33   ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-08 18:47     ` Alan Stern
2025-01-08 19:22       ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-09 16:17         ` Alan Stern
2025-01-09 16:44           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-09 19:27             ` Alan Stern
2025-01-09 20:09               ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-10  3:12                 ` Alan Stern
2025-01-10 12:21                   ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-10 21:51                     ` Alan Stern
2025-01-11 12:46                       ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-11 21:19                         ` Alan Stern
2025-01-12 15:55                           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2025-01-13 19:43                             ` Alan Stern
2025-07-23  0:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-23  7:26   ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
2025-07-23 16:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-24 14:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-25  5:23         ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
2025-07-29 20:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-23 17:13   ` Alan Stern
2025-07-23 17:27     ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-23 19:25   ` Alan Stern
2025-07-23 19:57     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4411cf20-f889-4fd7-9e03-14744deaaf72@paulmck-laptop \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).