loongarch.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	zhaotianrui@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	kernel@xen0n.name
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:17:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7CFC18ABD138F62B+086624ea-7d8d-411e-bd5d-4c79899c58db@uniontech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2074ae0a-5a3a-c0b5-cd09-040696679715@loongson.cn>


在 2026/4/28 17:50, Bibo Mao 写道:
>
>
> On 2026/4/28 下午3:47, Qiang Ma wrote:
>> It doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number of
>> vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs.
>>
>> Other architectures have already done this, such as Commit
>> 57a2e13ebdda ("KVM: MIPS: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS")
>>
>> Fixes: 482795cb62aa ("LoongArch: KVM: Implement VM related functions")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> index 8cc5ee1c53ef..1317c718f896 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>> long ext)
>>           r = 1;
>>           break;
>>       case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
>> -        r = num_online_cpus();
>> +        r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>>           break;
>>       case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
>>           r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
>>
> Hi Qiang,
>
> yes, this is better.
>
> Though value of CONFIG_NR_CPUS is 2048, currently max CPU number of 
> host hardware is 256 still because of limitation of AVEC and extioi HW 
> irqchip.
>
> If there is HW machine in future which supports more than 256 CPUs, 
> the max online CPU is no more than 256 with existing kernel version. 
> So I think that the "Fixes" tag is not necessary.
That makes sense. Let's remove the "Fixes" tag and send out the v2 version.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-28  7:47 [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS Qiang Ma
2026-04-28  9:50 ` Bibo Mao
2026-04-28 11:17   ` Qiang Ma [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7CFC18ABD138F62B+086624ea-7d8d-411e-bd5d-4c79899c58db@uniontech.com \
    --to=maqianga@uniontech.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).