From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
To: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Cc: maobibo@loongson.cn, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, kernel@xen0n.name,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lixianglai@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] LoongArch: KVM: Add dmsintc inject msi to the dest vcpu
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:52:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H7y8S6G+kh+qZ_q7Ug4JtzoGQ-ehUuA3uE63=gCpXyCGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324091521.2338235-3-gaosong@loongson.cn>
Hi, Song,
I'm sorry but it seems there are still bugs...
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 5:41 PM Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> Implement irqfd deliver msi to vcpu and vcpu dmsintc inject irq.
> Add irqfd choice dmsintc to set msi irq by the msg_addr and
> implement dmsintc set msi irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_dmsintc.h | 5 ++
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h | 4 +-
> arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/dmsintc.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c | 16 +++++-
> arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 +
> arch/loongarch/kvm/irqfd.c | 11 ++--
> 6 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_dmsintc.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_dmsintc.h
> index b04b89dd2a35..081ec8a7b874 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_dmsintc.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_dmsintc.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,16 @@ struct loongarch_dmsintc {
> struct kvm *kvm;
> uint64_t msg_addr_base;
> uint64_t msg_addr_size;
> + uint32_t cpu_mask;
> };
>
> struct dmsintc_state {
> atomic64_t vector_map[4];
> };
>
> +void dmsintc_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int dmsintc_deliver_msi_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 vector, int level);
> +int kvm_dmsintc_set_msi_irq(struct kvm *kvm, u32 addr, int data, int level);
I think addr should be u64.
> int kvm_loongarch_register_dmsintc_device(void);
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
> index 7f33a3039272..5f49b1f82c56 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct loongarch_pch_pic {
>
> int kvm_loongarch_register_pch_pic_device(void);
> void pch_pic_set_irq(struct loongarch_pch_pic *s, int irq, int level);
> -void pch_msi_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, int level);
> +struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
> +int pch_msi_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, int level);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_KVM_PCH_PIC_H */
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/dmsintc.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/dmsintc.c
> index 1bb61e55d061..6837ccbb4473 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/dmsintc.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/dmsintc.c
> @@ -4,9 +4,82 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_csr.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_dmsintc.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu.h>
>
> +int dmsintc_deliver_msi_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 vector, int level)
> +{
> + struct kvm_interrupt vcpu_irq;
> + struct dmsintc_state *ds;
> +
> + if (!level)
> + return 0;
> + if (!vcpu || vector >= 256)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + ds = &vcpu->arch.dmsintc_state;
> + if (!ds)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + set_bit(vector, (unsigned long *)&ds->vector_map);
> + vcpu_irq.irq = INT_AVEC;
> + kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(vcpu, &vcpu_irq);
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_dmsintc_set_msi_irq(struct kvm *kvm, u32 addr, int data, int level)
The kvm_ prefix can be removed.
> +{
> + unsigned int virq, dest;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + virq = (addr >> AVEC_IRQ_SHIFT) & AVEC_IRQ_MASK;
> + dest = (addr >> AVEC_CPU_SHIFT) & kvm->arch.dmsintc->cpu_mask;
> + if (dest > KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
I think it should be "if (dest > KVM_MAX_VCPUS)".
> + return -EINVAL;
> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid(kvm, dest);
> + if (!vcpu)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return dmsintc_deliver_msi_to_vcpu(kvm, vcpu, virq, level);
> +}
> +
> +void dmsintc_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct dmsintc_state *ds = &vcpu->arch.dmsintc_state;
> + unsigned int i;
> + unsigned long temp[4], old;
> +
> + if (!ds)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + old = atomic64_read(&(ds->vector_map[i]));
> + if (old)
> + temp[i] = atomic64_xchg(&(ds->vector_map[i]), 0);
> + }
> +
> + if (temp[0]) {
> + old = kvm_read_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR0);
> + kvm_write_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR0, temp[0]|old);
> + }
> +
> + if (temp[1]) {
> + old = kvm_read_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR1);
> + kvm_write_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR1, temp[1]|old);
> + }
> +
> + if (temp[2]) {
> + old = kvm_read_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR2);
> + kvm_write_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR2, temp[2]|old);
> + }
> +
> + if (temp[3]) {
> + old = kvm_read_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR3);
> + kvm_write_hw_gcsr(LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR3, temp[3]|old);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_dmsintc_ctrl_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
> struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> bool is_write)
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> index dd7e7f8d53db..1c0ed0665736 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <asm/kvm_eiointc.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_dmsintc.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_pch_pic.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu.h>
> #include <linux/count_zeros.h>
> @@ -67,9 +68,20 @@ void pch_pic_set_irq(struct loongarch_pch_pic *s, int irq, int level)
> }
>
> /* msi irq handler */
> -void pch_msi_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, int level)
> +int pch_msi_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, int level)
> {
> - eiointc_set_irq(kvm->arch.eiointc, irq, level);
> + u64 msg_addr;
> +
> + msg_addr = (((u64)e->msi.address_hi) << 32) | e->msi.address_lo;
Define and evaluate at the same time.
Huacai
> + if (cpu_has_msgint && kvm->arch.dmsintc &&
> + msg_addr >= kvm->arch.dmsintc->msg_addr_base &&
> + msg_addr < (kvm->arch.dmsintc->msg_addr_base + kvm->arch.dmsintc->msg_addr_size)) {
> + return kvm_dmsintc_set_msi_irq(kvm, msg_addr, e->msi.data, level);
> + }
> +
> + eiointc_set_irq(kvm->arch.eiointc, e->msi.data, level);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int loongarch_pch_pic_read(struct loongarch_pch_pic *s, gpa_t addr, int len, void *val)
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
> index fb704f4c8ac5..32930959f7c2 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_csr.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_dmsintc.h>
>
> static unsigned int priority_to_irq[EXCCODE_INT_NUM] = {
> [INT_TI] = CPU_TIMER,
> @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ static int kvm_irq_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int priority)
> irq = priority_to_irq[priority];
>
> if (kvm_guest_has_msgint(&vcpu->arch) && (priority == INT_AVEC)) {
> + dmsintc_inject_irq(vcpu);
> set_gcsr_estat(irq);
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/irqfd.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/irqfd.c
> index 9a39627aecf0..308ef08b634c 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/irqfd.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/irqfd.c
> @@ -28,10 +28,7 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> {
> if (!level)
> return -1;
> -
> - pch_msi_set_irq(kvm, e->msi.data, level);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return pch_msi_set_irq(kvm, e, level);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -71,13 +68,15 @@ int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm *kvm,
> int kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level, bool line_status)
> {
> + if (!level)
> + return -EWOULDBLOCK;
> +
> switch (e->type) {
> case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP:
> pch_pic_set_irq(kvm->arch.pch_pic, e->irqchip.pin, level);
> return 0;
> case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI:
> - pch_msi_set_irq(kvm, e->msi.data, level);
> - return 0;
> + return pch_msi_set_irq(kvm, e, level);
> default:
> return -EWOULDBLOCK;
> }
> --
> 2.39.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 9:15 [PATCH v8 0/2] LoongArch: KVM: Add DMSINTC support irqchip in kernel Song Gao
2026-03-24 9:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] LoongArch: KVM: Add DMSINTC device support Song Gao
2026-03-24 9:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] LoongArch: KVM: Add dmsintc inject msi to the dest vcpu Song Gao
2026-03-26 7:52 ` Huacai Chen [this message]
2026-03-26 12:28 ` gaosong
2026-03-26 12:40 ` Huacai Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAhV-H7y8S6G+kh+qZ_q7Ug4JtzoGQ-ehUuA3uE63=gCpXyCGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=gaosong@loongson.cn \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixianglai@loongson.cn \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).