From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, david@fromorbit.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
rcampbell@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, david@redhat.com, ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] mm/hmm: Remove dead check for HugeTLB and FS DAX
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:37:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhfnnYfqWKZn5Inh@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411122530.GQ5383@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:25:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:23AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
> > used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
> > code is dead code and can be removed.
>
> I'm not sure this is true.. pud_huge() is mostly a misspelling of pud_leaf()..
>
> > - if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
>
> I suspect this should be written as:
>
> if (pud_leaf(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
>
> In line with Peter's work here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240321220802.679544-1-peterx@redhat.com/
Just to provide more information for Alistair, this patch already switched
that over to a _leaf():
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240318200404.448346-12-peterx@redhat.com
That's in mm-unstable now, so should see that in a rebase.
And btw it's great to see that pxx_devmap() can go away.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 0:57 [RFC 00/10] fs/dax: Fix FS DAX page reference counts Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 01/10] mm/gup.c: Remove redundant check for PCI P2PDMA page Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 12:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 13:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-12 1:37 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 02/10] mm/hmm: Remove dead check for HugeTLB and FS DAX Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 13:37 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-04-12 1:28 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 03/10] pci/p2pdma: Don't initialise page refcount to one Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 12:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-12 5:40 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-12 17:20 ` Dan Williams
2024-05-09 21:59 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2024-05-09 23:14 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 04/10] fs/dax: Don't track page mapping/index Alistair Popple
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-12 17:31 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-15 7:03 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-15 20:51 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-16 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-16 0:36 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-12 17:21 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 05/10] fs/dax: Refactor wait for dax idle page Alistair Popple
2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-13 20:19 ` John Hubbard
2024-04-15 8:41 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 06/10] fs/dax: Add dax_page_free callback Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 07/10] mm: Allow compound zone device pages Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 12:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 14:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-12 1:38 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 08/10] fs/dax: Properly refcount fs dax pages Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 09/10] mm/khugepage.c: Warn if trying to scan devmap pmd Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-12 1:34 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 0:57 ` [RFC 10/10] mm: Remove pXX_devmap Alistair Popple
2024-04-11 12:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 17:28 ` [RFC 00/10] fs/dax: Fix FS DAX page reference counts Dan Williams
2024-04-11 17:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 17:56 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-12 3:54 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-12 6:55 ` Alistair Popple
2024-04-12 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-12 17:32 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhfnnYfqWKZn5Inh@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).