Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] ocfs2: convert to use i_blockmask() - Joseph Qi via Ocfs2-devel

From: Joseph Qi via Ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>,
	xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, huyue2@coolpad.com,
	jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, rpeterso@redhat.com,
	agruenba@redhat.com, mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] ocfs2: convert to use i_blockmask()
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:13:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <faca55dc-fe0d-9014-ede2-f55124cb4227@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310054829.4241-4-frank.li@vivo.com>

On 3/10/23 1:48 PM, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Use i_blockmask() to simplify code. BTW convert ocfs2_is_io_unaligned
> to return bool type and the fact that the value will be the same
> (i.e. that ->i_blkbits is never changed by ocfs2).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/file.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index efb09de4343d..7fd06a4d27d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -2159,14 +2159,9 @@ int ocfs2_check_range_for_refcount(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos)
> +static bool ocfs2_is_io_unaligned(struct inode *inode, size_t count, loff_t pos)
>  {
> -	int blockmask = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - 1;
> -	loff_t final_size = pos + count;
> -
> -	if ((pos & blockmask) || (final_size & blockmask))
> -		return 1;
> -	return 0;
> +	return ((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode)) != 0;

Or !!((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode))?

My concern is just like erofs, we'd better get vfs helper into mainline
first. Or can we fold the whole series into one patch? Since it's simple
enough I think.

Thanks,
Joseph

>  }
>  
>  static int ocfs2_inode_lock_for_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel