From: Abu Cishubis <ldevlzero@gmail.com>
To: chipsec@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: chipsec-1.5.0 in EFI Shell
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:53:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPwg83hKi=HsmztgArOeHJDw2kdOm6pM9b_amuqhGxTpy9ZkLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB47467F7E6BC2FE277003885DFBD80@MW3PR11MB4746.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7191 bytes --]
Hi Aaron,
The issue was solved. I run chipsec in a separate directory. It works also
without the ‘-^#’ option.
Thanks a lot.
Philipp
Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 18:59 Uhr schrieb Holtsclaw, Brent <
brent.holtsclaw@intel.com>:
> Please try putting the chipsec files in a chipsec folder and running.
> There have been problems in the past when the chipsec files are placed
> within the root directory.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
>
>
> *From:* Vorname Nachname <ldevlzero@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 5, 2020 2:20 AM
> *To:* chipsec(a)lists.01.org
> *Subject:* [chipsec] Re: chipsec-1.5.0 in EFI Shell
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I saw a new chipsec version 1.5.1 is released now. I followed the
> instructions
> from chipsec-manual.pdf and used the python version from chipsec archive.
> I took
> the shell from edk2 package again. See this both links:
>
> https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec/archive/1.5.1.tar.gz
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/archive/edk2-stable201903.tar.gz
>
> I got almost the same error as before with a different number. I attached a
> screenshot.
>
> Can anyone verify this issue?
>
> Best Regards,
> Philipp
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 29. Mai 2020 um 17:16 Uhr schrieb Vorname Nachname <
> ldevlzero(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> Many thanks for the quick answers. I followed the instructions from the
> chipsec-manual.pdf of chipsec-1.5.0. In my first test I used python version
> from chipsec-1.5.0 (chipsec_uefi_x64.zip) and UEFI-Shell from edk2 release
> 2019-03-08 (
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/archive/edk2-stable201903.tar.gz). This
> includes a precompiled UEFI-Shell binary which I used
> (edk2-edk2-stable201903/ShellBinPkg/UefiShell/X64). With this setup I got
> this error:
>
> OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: 'FS0:FS0:chipsec'
>
> Can you tell me your working setup (UEFI-Binary and pyhton version)?
>
> Best regards
> Philipp
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 29. Mai 2020 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Vorname Nachname <
> ldevlzero(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> Many thanks for the quick answers. I followed the instructions from the
> chipsec-manual.pdf of chipsec-1.5.0. In my first test I used python version
> from chipsec-1.5.0 (chipsec_uefi_x64.zip) and UEFI-Shell from edk2 release
> 2019-03-08 (
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/archive/edk2-stable201903.tar.gz). This
> includes a precompiled UEFI-Shell binary which I used
> (edk2-edk2-stable201903/ShellBinPkg/UefiShell/X64). With this setup I got
> this error:
>
> OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: 'FS0:FS0:chipsec'
>
> Can you tell me your working setup (UEFI-Binary and pyhton version)?
>
> Best regards
> Philipp
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 29. Mai 2020 um 00:24 Uhr schrieb Holtsclaw, Brent <
> brent.holtsclaw(a)intel.com>:
>
> Did you follow the instructions from
> https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec/wiki/Creating-a-Bootable-USB-drive-with-UEFI-Shell?
> They should have enough information to help out. It sounds like UEFI SHELL
> is not the problem in this case. Can you elaborate on the python that you
> are using. There is a python.efi module within the chipsec_uefi zipfile.
> Python has been modified to include some chipsec specific commands with
> chipsec. There are steps to reproduce the build, however I'm not sure that
> they work with the latest EDK and you may need to build from an older
> version. To my knowledge the code within chipsec is still compatible with
> python2 at this point and you should be able to use 1.5.0. If you can run
> chipsec with the debug flag and let us know where it is failing that would
> help.
>
> Thanks,
> Brent
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blibbet <blibbet@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:55 PM
> To: Vorname Nachname <ldevlzero@gmail.com>
> Cc: chipsec(a)lists.01.org
> Subject: [chipsec] Re: chipsec-1.5.0 in EFI Shell
>
> What UEFI Shell are you using? "EFI Shell" may mean an ancient one. I
> think I recall some thread where someone was trying to get CHIPSEC running
> using an old (1.x?) OEM's shell (Apple?), and they had to provide their own
> instead. There is an older and a newer UEFI Shell.
>
> You should also include info about other Python code you were able to
> successfully run in this EFI Shell. Maybe CHIPSEC is not the issue, the
> issue is your EFI Shell and Python.
>
> Instead of building your own UEFI Python, what happens when you use the
> CHIPSEC instructions and use their supplied python.efi? Wasn't there some
> special CHIPSEC-centric options needed to build Python with? If so, that
> should be clarified better in build docs.
>
> (Granted, it sucks having a security tool ship a pre-compiled Python
> binary in their source tree, built in an unknown manner, with no checksums,
> and no reproducable builds, and have the tool rely on this for determining
> platform security. But that's another issue...)
>
> Intel has abandoned CPython V2 for UEFI patch, and is instead is working
> on MicroPython for UEFI (which has some Python V3 support). Though Python
> V2 is deprecated and most of world has moved to Python V3, CHIPSEC team is
> still using/bundling CPython V2, and hasn't switched over to
> using/relying-on/bundling MicroPython for UEFI.
>
> FWIW, I rarely see replies from the team for support questions on this
> mailing list nor the Google Groups lists. It I was looking for a reply, I'd
> file a Github issue (and include more info), or use Twitter.
>
> You might want to clarify that you're trying to run this on an Intel
> system, not another ISA (like AMD or ARM or RISC-V), as that'd also not
> work.
>
> HTH,
> Lee
>
> On 5/28/20 7:36 AM, Vorname Nachname wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to run chipsec-1.5.0 in EFI Shell without operating system but
> > unfortunately it doesn't run in the EFI Shell. I ran these commands:
> >
> > Shell> fs0:
> > FS0:\> python -^# chipsec_main.py -m debugenabled
> >
> > This results in a traceback with the last file chipsec/defines.py
> > called function get_version().
> >
> > OSError: [Errno 22] Invalud argument: 'FS0:FS0:chipsec'
> >
> > After that I compiled python 2.7.2 and python 2.7.10 from edk2 package
> > version edk2-stable201903. This is the last package version with
> > pyhton inside. With this version of pyhton I received another error
> > message with the last line:
> >
> > ImportError: No module named expat; use SimpleXMLTreeBuilder instead.
> >
> > What is the best way to start the latest version of chipsec in the EFI
> > Shell? What version of EFI Shell and pyhton is required?
> >
> > best wishes
> > Philipp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > chipsec mailing list -- chipsec(a)lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an
> > email to chipsec-leave(a)lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> chipsec mailing list -- chipsec(a)lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email
> to chipsec-leave(a)lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> chipsec mailing list -- chipsec(a)lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to chipsec-leave(a)lists.01.org
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.htm --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 10519 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAPwg83iAx0xpQ3kUJ1ELfaEbkaof6yuOc4uhVMhtXjQkEVrNoA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-05-29 15:16 ` chipsec-1.5.0 in EFI Shell Vorname Nachname
2020-06-05 9:14 ` Vorname Nachname
2020-06-05 18:33 ` Holtsclaw, Brent
2020-06-08 14:00 ` Vorname Nachname
2020-12-29 17:59 ` Holtsclaw, Brent
2021-01-04 15:53 ` Abu Cishubis [this message]
2020-05-28 14:36 Vorname Nachname
2020-05-28 21:54 ` Blibbet
2020-05-28 22:24 ` Holtsclaw, Brent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPwg83hKi=HsmztgArOeHJDw2kdOm6pM9b_amuqhGxTpy9ZkLg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ldevlzero@gmail.com \
--cc=chipsec@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).