RCU Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	 "Cc: Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Observation on NOHZ_FULL
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:02:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YQP4i_-fcypKuo+9=2NruYuKich5CHzLKdpBeENntd_xQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zc4Ojw8LsYRGzo_y@pc636>

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:16 AM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:51:54AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 10:44:33AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > ...
> > > >
> > > >  - with lazy RCU enabled hrtimer_interrupt() takes like 2x more to
> > > >    return, respect to the other cases (is this expected?)
> > >
> > > This last is surprising at first glance, but I could be missing
> > > something.  Joel, Uladzislau, thoughts?
> >
> > On this specific point, I repeated the tests with the latest 6.8
> > kernel and now I don't notice this difference anymore.
> >
> > hrtimer_interrupt() time is always in the range [4K, 16K) ns, both with
> > lazy RCU off and lazy RCU on.
> >
> > I don't really know why I was getting different results, probably some
> > noise triggered by something running in user-space...?
> >
> > In any case I will update my old post with these new results and I
> > wouldn't consider this an issue for now.
> >
> Thank you for your confirmation, so our results are aligned in terms of
> i also do not see the difference and issues with hrtimer_interrupt()
> duration time.
>

Thanks Vlad and Andrea. That's a relief !!! ;-)

 - Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29 17:47 Observation on NOHZ_FULL Joel Fernandes
2024-01-29 20:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-29 22:16   ` Joel Fernandes
2024-01-30  6:58     ` Andrea Righi
2024-01-30 10:17       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-30 11:06         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-30 11:27           ` Andrea Righi
2024-01-30 11:41             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-30 13:39             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-06 17:51               ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-06 18:44                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-07 13:04                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-07 15:12                     ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-07 15:49                       ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-15  7:51                   ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-15 13:15                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-15 14:02                       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2024-02-07 15:48                 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-07 16:31                   ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-07 16:52                     ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-07 17:05                       ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-08  5:54                         ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-08  6:55                           ` Andrea Righi
2024-02-08 12:53                             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-08 14:51                               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-12  0:22                                 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-12  9:05                                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-12  9:44                                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-29 20:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-29 22:20   ` Joel Fernandes
2024-01-29 22:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-29 22:53       ` Joel Fernandes
2024-01-29 23:11         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-29 23:36           ` Joel Fernandes
2024-01-30  0:40       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEXW_YQP4i_-fcypKuo+9=2NruYuKich5CHzLKdpBeENntd_xQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).