From: patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
sforshee@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] acl: drop posix acl handlers from xattr handlers
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:07:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168255044073.16014.8337870090900748986.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230125-fs-acl-remove-generic-xattr-handlers-v3-0-f760cc58967d@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:14:51 +0100 you wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> After we finished the introduction of the new posix acl api last cycle
> we still left the generic POSIX ACL xattr handlers around in the
> filesystems xattr handlers for two reasons:
>
> (1) Because a few filesystems rely on the ->list() method of the generic
> POSIX ACL xattr handlers in their ->listxattr() inode operation.
> (2) POSIX ACLs are only available if IOP_XATTR is raised. The IOP_XATTR
> flag is raised in inode_init_always() based on whether the
> sb->s_xattr pointer is non-NULL. IOW, the registered xattr handlers
> of the filesystem are used to raise IOP_XATTR.
> If we were to remove the generic POSIX ACL xattr handlers from all
> filesystems we would risk regressing filesystems that only implement
> POSIX ACL support and no other xattrs (nfs3 comes to mind).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev,v3,05/10] fs: simplify ->listxattr() implementation
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/a5488f29835c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 13:14 [PATCH v3 00/10] acl: drop posix acl handlers from xattr handlers Christian Brauner
2023-02-01 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] reiserfs: rework ->listxattr() implementation Christian Brauner
2023-02-01 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] reiserfs: rework priv inode handling Christian Brauner
2023-02-01 13:30 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] acl: drop posix acl handlers from xattr handlers Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-01 13:42 ` Christian Brauner
2023-03-06 9:26 ` Christian Brauner
2023-03-06 9:23 ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-26 23:07 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168255044073.16014.8337870090900748986.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+f2fs@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).