From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Tech Board Discuss
<tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Where are the nominations?
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:03:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161026120352.665d028c@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7N0kYTh+aT82zU1cN9bGtqOuCOSUzdGo_c+jp00z73mw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:39:27 -0700
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > I haven't seen any nominations as of yet. Has anyone else? I'm sending
> > this to make sure that I'm receiving emails from this list.
>
> Well, I received this. :)
I haven't yet :-/ I'm the one that will be updating a google doc with
all nominations. If I'm not receiving emails for nominations, then
I wont be able to do this.
Chris, am I subscribed to this list?
>
> I tried, once, for a TAB slot, but not being particularly well known
> outside the embedded linux/bufferbloat community, got so few votes as
> to not be inclined to run again. I would certainly like there to be
> one or more TAB members plugged into the problems of IoT and Linux.
I'm the one to push having TAB nominations write up what they want to
bring to the TAB and why they would be a good fit as a TAB member. I
don't think having a 1 minute overview, at the start of the votes, of
why you should be a TAB member is sufficient for any real election.
I want to make a document of all the nominees and what they plan
on bringing to the TAB, where others can read and give rational thought
about who they want to vote for. Otherwise, the TAB simply becomes a
popularity contest.
If you would like to try again, send out a nomination and explain what
you can bring to the table. If enough people want a better embedded
and IoT knowledge on the TAB then they may indeed vote for you.
Your situation is the reason I'm pushing for more knowledge about who
the candidates are. The TAB needs a diverse group of kernel developers
that will bring different backgrounds and knowledge to help advise the
Linux Foundation.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 15:17 [Tech-board-discuss] Where are the nominations? Steven Rostedt
2016-10-26 15:39 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-26 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-10-26 16:18 ` Chris Mason
2016-10-26 16:05 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161026120352.665d028c@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).