Questions about state of the tree

Questions about state of the tree

[Luis Lavena]

Hello Guys,

Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.

Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
being mongrel one of these items in my list.

I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.

But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.

For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
version).

Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?

Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!

Regards,
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from
the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so.
Douglas Adams

Re: Questions about state of the tree

[Evan Weaver]

Hi Luis,

 I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.

evan

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
> to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
>
> Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
> One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
> being mongrel one of these items in my list.
>
> I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
> regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
>
> But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
>
> For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
> and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
> version).
>
> Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
> to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
>
> Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
>
> Regards,
> --
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from
> the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
> disinclination to do so.
> Douglas Adams
> _______________________________________________
> Mongrel-development mailing list
> Mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
>



-- 
Evan Weaver

Re: Questions about state of the tree

[Eric Wong]

Evan Weaver <evan-72XWLPH10WVXUHR/Jj/Uug@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
>  I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.

Actually, I was just getting around to the Ragel 6.x issues on the
internal branch I'm using at $DAY_JOB.  I'll clean those up and commit
in a bit (I've been running Ragel 5.23 + mongrel trunk in production for
a while now...)

> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hello Guys,
> >
> > Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
> > to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
> >
> > Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
> > One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
> > being mongrel one of these items in my list.
> >
> > I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
> > regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
> >
> > But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
> >
> > For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
> > and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
> > version).
> >
> > Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
> > to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
> >
> > Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
> >
> > Regards,

Re: Questions about state of the tree

[Evan Weaver]

Please do!

Evan

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson-rMlxZR9MS24@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Evan Weaver <evan-72XWLPH10WVXUHR/Jj/Uug@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>>  I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.
>
> Actually, I was just getting around to the Ragel 6.x issues on the
> internal branch I'm using at $DAY_JOB.  I'll clean those up and commit
> in a bit (I've been running Ragel 5.23 + mongrel trunk in production for
> a while now...)
>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > Hello Guys,
>> >
>> > Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
>> > to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
>> >
>> > Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
>> > One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
>> > being mongrel one of these items in my list.
>> >
>> > I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
>> > regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
>> >
>> > But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
>> >
>> > For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
>> > and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
>> > version).
>> >
>> > Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
>> > to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
>> >
>> > Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
>> >
>> > Regards,
> _______________________________________________
> Mongrel-development mailing list
> Mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
>



-- 
Evan Weaver