From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Wong Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.mongrel.devel Subject: Re: Mongrel 2.0 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:48:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20081206004827.GA1002@yp-box.dyndns.org> References: Reply-To: mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228524523 24557 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2008 00:48:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 00:48:43 +0000 (UTC) To: mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Original-X-From: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Sat Dec 06 01:49:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrmd-mongrel-development@m.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.mongrel.devel:82 Archived-At: Received: from rubyforge.org ([205.234.109.19]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L8lMe-0006tk-If for gclrmd-mongrel-development@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:49:44 +0100 Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF418581B0; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from hand.yhbt.net (hand.yhbt.net [66.150.188.102]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFCA18581B0 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:48:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hand.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5572DC01A; Sat, 6 Dec 2008 00:48:27 +0000 (UTC) List-Post: Evan Weaver wrote: > Hi Mongrels, Hi Evan, > I'm working on trunk and would like to change the following things and > release it as a 2.0rc. Is this still happening in SVN? I haven't seen anything (of course, you may be busy, as I haven't checked this list in nearly a month, either :x) > - 1.9.1rc compatibility Will we be trying different connection/thread models to (possibly) work better with the 1.9 and its use of native threading? Fibers, maybe? or just use async sockets in our code explicitly... -- Eric Wong