From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Luis Lavena" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.mongrel.devel Subject: Questions about state of the tree Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:51:32 +0200 Message-ID: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214931119 18671 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2008 16:51:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) To: "Mongrel Developers (ML)" Original-X-From: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Tue Jul 01 18:52:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrmd-mongrel-development@m.gmane.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=m0N8hoIcNdxtvKLzX+hLyKp3dF1YuvNIwDNSa9GeXKE=; b=d+9zWqk/8w1nBonV43SdKB80AV531qqJA9P/WiEdGNzLfCGG24YlvhEKvdPVIhWARE P5U2/MPwQKdlqpTY/SMioMlvzXGuJYkloxuWPGy7eVR1Wc2OfmB+dMYgUuaDs5c3ojjl 7p3/02JL53Prv63vyPdKeTnCnxPJ7Y28gkoLE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XnRSqfCRBCyTrykqWTB3I7wzrGA81rgRnNUUG5Cy9pWXpsd+67h+ic0F0QYmFLIgad ZaZWWsjcWFuYUejprH5ES8Aaau2c9c8WJ2nQJJA07DCvDr3Km3C4LqsWHkArnzRpAaBT GHt2olKaMskwIuoUsdae/CXq5RzAfGiJmrwz0= Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: mongrel-development-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: mongrel-development-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.mongrel.devel:58 Archived-At: Received: from rubyforge.org ([205.234.109.19]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDj5i-0007XZ-7B for gclrmd-mongrel-development@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:52:30 +0200 Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0E918581AB; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:51:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AFC18581A6 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so413671yxb.59 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.12.10 with SMTP id 10mr5862824wal.190.1214931092814; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.146.15 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:51:32 -0700 (PDT) List-Post: Hello Guys, Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW. Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention, being mongrel one of these items in my list. I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform. But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps. For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed, and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6 version). Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch? Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week! Regards, -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. Douglas Adams