Re: Mongrel for 1.9, for real?

[Luis Lavena <luislavena-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Evan Weaver<evan-72XWLPH10WVXUHR/Jj/Uug@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Ugh, sorry. Mongrel is not dead, but rather severely neglected by me.
>

And me. Been focusing a lot on RubyInstaller and the related tools.

> We still use it at Twitter, for what it's worth. I will gather up the
> 1.9 bits I have and send you the details.
>

Cool, you know my email already ;-)

> What cross-compilation strategy did you want to use for MinGW?
>

rake-compiler and fat binaries:

http://github.com/luislavena/rake-compiler/tree/

Cheers,
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry