From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS14383 205.234.109.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Tucker Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general Subject: Re: impromptu Rainbows!/Zbatery user survey Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:46:35 -0300 Message-ID: <75572EBC-8A70-46F4-BCE3-3CDA30E20F63@gmail.com> References: <20100616005653.GA29720@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20100616190835.GA20621@dcvr.yhbt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276804333 3749 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2010 19:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Rainbows! list Original-X-From: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Thu Jun 17 21:52:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org X-Original-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Delivered-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Greylist: delayed 326 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:05 EDT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=u422zxHlqYUxULp//V6y1eqXKSbGPRNHVRJ+NZSAoxg=; b=QkM+H9ogVjuqijAYrm/2iOPnrgXowOlCnhrh0NZiBuJ631BZN2+C43sWfBNZTCz0Au z+djbYOvck7h5YJjdutv3QgZNzgb9+XYQuXczxlZ573v9F9BAMBYJeZsAPI2MDDGEIit elvNpHLKFLAEQosOGXy6bpYLpxfBf2BylSWpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=q5j9C9omLTfL9F47L1cSryI4ghLJigrQg0waRS9KEYGdwOepvNXBL2Gpe5ReyO0rn8 PFLdAAGrGvqyHRHHMSFcP06YOm/k/ABeU+6AKg8OX9gY4UajKLDwfhIEap5k7yZx8qOv UMB4roJ35nq0JPX9+qGgZdeU7dSnjQCjy5AtA= In-Reply-To: <20100616190835.GA20621-yBiyF41qdooeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-BeenThere: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general:90 Archived-At: Received: from rubyforge.org ([205.234.109.19]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPL8D-0004QH-R1 for gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:52:10 +0200 Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E05A185836B; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com (mail-qy0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE498185836B for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so1702840qyk.23 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.52.23 with SMTP id f23mr13311qag.57.1276803999442; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.112] ([199.172.209.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g27sm30716006qcq.20.2010.06.17.12.46.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:46:38 -0700 (PDT) On 16 Jun 2010, at 16:08, Eric Wong wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Since Rainbows! can be configured so many different ways, I'm >> wondering about how (or even if :) people use it in production. > > One more question: > > * What proxies, if any, run in front? Either to distribute > load between machines, handle failover for a dead machine, to serve > static files, etc... I do know of a bunch of folks using async Thin in production for relatively high concurrency levels (1-4k open connections) serving through nginx. I personally can't verify the numbers, as the boxes are behind doors to which I don't have keys. I don't know if this info is useful to you. >> Behind the scenes, I've privately helped some folks deploy a few >> production apps using ThreadSpawn (REE 2010.01), FiberSpawn >> (1.9.1-p378), and EventMachine (REE 2010.01). I can't say more than >> that due to confidentiality issues, but I suspect WEBrick would've been >> more than adequate for those applications :) > > _None_ of these are proxied behind nginx. They only need a load > balancer to distribute load between multiple machines and to handle > failover if a box goes down. > > They either use haproxy or a similar, but overpriced black-box[1]. They > either do pass-through (Layer 4, TCP-only) or only buffer (and possibly > rewrite) HTTP headers (Layer 7). I forget which apps used which, but > Rainbows! works great in all of those configurations. > > [1] not my decision to use it, of course :) > > -- > Eric Wong > _______________________________________________ > Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk > Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying _______________________________________________ Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying