From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS14383 205.234.109.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Tucker Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general Subject: Re: deferrable bodies in Rainbows! Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:32:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9363563c-cbd4-498f-b9ee-b3ee83fa15b8@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <20091224224956.GB4847@dcvr.yhbt.net> <1c5622660912241540v74329427nd1053b6e602e6506@mail.gmail.com> <20091225002451.GA1821@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20091226232732.GA26351@dcvr.yhbt.net> <9D8F97A8-F08E-437E-82EE-AD885824291A@gmail.com> <20091227021603.GB28140@dcvr.yhbt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261881338 26612 80.91.229.12 (27 Dec 2009 02:35:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:35:38 +0000 (UTC) To: Rainbows! list Original-X-From: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Sun Dec 27 03:35:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org X-Original-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Delivered-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=mmMILnKeZBhZKPyD4uyKZ1Dd4j2JE9Kzbav+Rr0kF9E=; b=IfMm9aPD5wP7erMfeSaPOQ4HHNIJTfA+DyMxr/zgkn7A59PFs/lkFb+EsrgIP08ukq 5rzVYtGUv5IC6HmXtefXI0Fa3bC3vIm747Frs2VUFKSkMzVZl+DG/EELmRw4OnZtwdcP Ds/aGg6SOWKSiP9l8Pq4E4tAsEQ0P0p3no0qI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=XX6sr6ClGcdsCaxqvuD1EF4MaXjytpUvADXYB4pAJvacRwRlCeE2+dZxavjPoXy2xh FqLGNfLvsMxl/AWjR1uRCX+FXMI4MsQ6J67F9OzNJ2ItgNWOJHcfXPsxqWgOca5/YU9z IciGQ4AmLNUfINxG0D9N6lGAyBeORRkCPFFVw= In-Reply-To: <20091227021603.GB28140-yBiyF41qdooeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-BeenThere: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general:62 Archived-At: Received: from rubyforge.org ([205.234.109.19]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NOiyg-0000Qu-6Q for gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:35:30 +0100 Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C3A185827F; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:35:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030BF185827F for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1575424qwb.29 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:32:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.0.157 with SMTP id 29mr6806236qab.373.1261881176596; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:32:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.54? ([199.172.234.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm28451719qwf.54.2009.12.26.18.32.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:32:56 -0800 (PST) On 27 Dec 2009, at 02:16, Eric Wong wrote: > James Tucker wrote: > (snip stuff I mostly agree with, pondering some still...) >> Sorry for yet another rushed reply (starting to feel real bad about >> that over here) :( > > No worries, at least the message got through. > >> P.S. This S/MIME rejection is really starting to grate me, I'm wishing >> Mail.app had the ability to forcibly stop doing that for specific >> addresses, but their S/MIME support is as embedded as most other >> clients (for mostly better, and occasionally worse). > > I'll consider allowing signatures if it makes your life easier... No don't worry, I just need to get used to it :-S > > However I strongly believe the content of messages trumps the identity > of the sender, and signatures in public correspondence shouldn't matter. I'd agree if I hadn't had a distasteful person spoof me in the past in an attempt to defame my character. The person in question was reprimanded, but, in that case it was easy to track him down - not that I expect that to happen in this community. Don't worry about changing anything, I'll stop whining (sorry) :) > -- > Eric Wong > _______________________________________________ > Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk > Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying _______________________________________________ Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying