unicorn Ruby/Rack server user+dev discussion/patches/pulls/bugs/help
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net>
To: Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@shopify.com>
Cc: unicorn-public@yhbt.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add early hints support
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:09:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720100958.GA7043@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <624157B8-884C-42EB-8515-AFC6807D6F8D@shopify.com>

Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@shopify.com> wrote:
> > I guess... I was wondering more in terms of the big picture with
> > HTTP parsing, I/O, and response generation taken into account.
> I wasn't too sure how to benchmark the entire loop. But regardless
> 18/20M i/s shows that it should be meaningless. It's only executed
> once per request, so would "waste" 1 second for 18 million requests
> processed.

Yeah, it can't support persistent connections, so Unix sockets
are required to avoid TCP port exhaustion and ensure repeatable

> > (and there may be improvements in those areas later this year,
> > assuming the world doesn't end sooner...)
> If you are interested in general optimizations, I did spot a bunch
> of sub optimal patterns, such as `=~` in places where a string
> comparison, or `match?` would do.
> However many optimizations are only available on more recent
> rubies.

`match?' is Ruby 2.4+, which is probably too big a jump since
we're still on Ruby 1.9.3 at the moment... (though maybe 2.3+
is/was on the horizon).

String comparison as in `==' and `!='?  Would be interested to know
where and what improvements can be had.

But yeah, Ruby just seems hopeless performance-wise (and
compatibility-wise :P); so unicorn mainly exists to keep legacy
projects alive.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 10:05 [PATCH] Add early hints support Jean Boussier
2020-07-16 10:50 ` Eric Wong
2020-07-16 11:41   ` Jean Boussier
2020-07-16 12:16     ` Eric Wong
2020-07-16 12:24       ` Jean Boussier
2020-07-17  1:19         ` Eric Wong
2020-07-20  9:18           ` Jean Boussier
2020-07-20 10:09             ` Eric Wong [this message]
2020-07-20 10:27               ` Jean Boussier
2020-07-20 10:55                 ` Eric Wong
2020-07-20 11:53                   ` Jean Boussier
2020-07-20 20:27                     ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://yhbt.net/unicorn/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200720100958.GA7043@dcvr \
    --to=e@yhbt.net \
    --cc=jean.boussier@shopify.com \
    --cc=unicorn-public@yhbt.net \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).