From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS43289 178.175.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from fragranza.investici.org (fragranza.investici.org [178.175.144.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D86E2021E for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated sender: praveen@onenetbeyond.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8491C2C00D4; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:48:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onenetbeyond.org; s=stigmate; t=1478188105; bh=Okemv9eZpfAc6F4Gr5Jy9XIL5mdpIFATrRe/IZFWKSg=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=R4p0YyQL6CEGtuO5XICVzA+JFaZKIZsOAqJhCpVrJ4nHa6BTd/2IsOkpCk+WI0cHK 3MiXEVrgMfAYcsYvpy6FUKVN0PvuF13ubQm9g2rx34xwxxPDx0blYswtsWpT0qfsNq FNHbq+MOvEo4G72j+O3gl7qZ90VllRYjxv6DXJdo= Subject: Re: trying to update unicorn to 5.1, build failure: VERSION= must be specified To: Eric Wong , Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com> References: <20161028002315.GA15205@starla> Cc: debian-ruby , unicorn-public@bogomips.org From: Pirate Praveen X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <2068da61-0ff0-4653-4aa5-598c46354c6a@onenetbeyond.org> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:16:10 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161028002315.GA15205@starla> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G3XLuR4Flbg9I6HrgFl8iMJAQH7q4iVWX" List-Id: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --G3XLuR4Flbg9I6HrgFl8iMJAQH7q4iVWX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 28 October 2016 05:53 AM, Eric Wong wrote: > I understand olddoc may not be worth the effort to package in > Debian. (I already tried to reduce dependencies in olddoc > compared to wrongdoc, but a package is a package...) >=20 > Anyways, I suggest you guys grab the generated gemspec from the > Rubygem or tar.gz. You already seem to be doing that with NEWS > and the manpages to avoid a build-dep on pandoc(*). We are already using the rubygems.org .gem file and it has olddoc. > Maybe the gemspec in git could have olddoc become optional, too, > while still remaining DRY. The email address for the public > mailing list is already specified in multiple places, so maybe > over-DRY-ing isn't worth it... If you can make it optional that would be great. For now I've just patched out the gemspec to not use olddoc. The patch and fix in rules is ugly. --G3XLuR4Flbg9I6HrgFl8iMJAQH7q4iVWX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYG1vDAAoJEM4fnGdFEsIqn6gP/0DCtn+zuvzYE9GJEAR0ySvB MC0UGMEu4G+v+s3+MJtbPrEOYIhycNMDG6MOlNs4WF/4RpiJp75VyvdXeQRFGjSI 1a9bBqdEVrddUtYqgm4Q25Z0AFfuRmQsX+V9JmCW6pRvZwM1+V6fiUvfaRwhVH1E CilirFNh9bYm2W8Wr7PuYtmzAUgnGx9v/R6306qwU/Tae2RMNIABC0k1fvRn0w3q q6quQ0dfS3yd5uu18WYsjDYYczv64L7EvxE0hWjn5SJfUPXfiT6EHcNOeK8wDNW9 3qoGmzUqJ5x8nklxFAeUGFXpsx/w2jXRQuf9NlQ0e3pMuQ+U4K4sJqMPd3wsBnBi 8F/saLABCmIvrYQKHOiPhvvQIYSL+1/53MVT0sjKzVTI30eb5ATQ0/IO9Zv0Mjg9 Ox0xYiMBRVV9BLsXUKONd1jKwL2mZJl+GTa1krX0zbeDyxC70VXcG7HsuTWA8WvC txQvuIsgMfZqinz6E9YqMJFd1Cap+B7hfcOswckeymTvBp6OCgq95RmYyumAfEa5 K7pTxl+MJbhVWQsWhyf0bAY7SgxC2VCZc/INffOJ80SQoiqVNjvwqWoM+3RQWEoJ QJFFN5ve3GmD2mi2hrGIrHpQkrqhmKSXFLly3Fi5P7MtUReJjrwJZwAoVFeahKrr YP3T44Ykdxnc4pxE/CZz =jFfw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G3XLuR4Flbg9I6HrgFl8iMJAQH7q4iVWX--