From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS8075 157.56.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0144.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3411F9F5 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CY1PR0301MB0780.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.160.140) by CY1PR0301MB0780.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.160.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.136.25; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:56:34 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0301MB0780.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.160.140]) by CY1PR0301MB0780.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.160.140]) with mapi id 15.01.0136.026; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:56:34 +0000 From: "Mulvaney, Mike" To: Eric Wong CC: "unicorn-public@bogomips.org" Subject: Re: TeeInput leaks file handles/space Thread-Topic: TeeInput leaks file handles/space Thread-Index: AdB9Gw2r1ccEWvn3Q9SwOq7RL1z5OwAEGx4AAAEU3eAAAD7iAAAAK9hQAEKeWAAAEnEHhA== Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:56:34 +0000 Message-ID: <4AFBD0B0-1C88-4450-992D-3C0C4D0B0D55@bna.com> References: <20150422183808.GA5277@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20150422191608.GA31363@dcvr.yhbt.net> ,<20150424030832.GA26295@dcvr.yhbt.net> In-Reply-To: <20150424030832.GA26295@dcvr.yhbt.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [70.15.40.100] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0780; x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(52604005)(24454002)(377454003)(51704005)(54356999)(36756003)(2656002)(87936001)(2900100001)(50986999)(2950100001)(76176999)(99286002)(102836002)(122556002)(33656002)(62966003)(86362001)(82746002)(40100003)(92566002)(83716003)(66066001)(77156002)(19580395003)(46102003)(110136001)(93886004)(19580405001)(104396002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0780;H:CY1PR0301MB0780.namprd03.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006)(3002001);SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0780;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0780; x-forefront-prvs: 05568D1FF7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: bna.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Apr 2015 11:56:34.3471 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 97be21fd-c601-4b16-9920-f5accc69da65 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB0780 List-Id: That sounds great. Thanks for fixing this so fast! -Mike > On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:08 PM, Eric Wong wrote: >=20 > "Mulvaney, Mike" wrote: >> I think it would be reasonable to fix this for Rack 1.6+. It won't >> cause any problems for Rack 1.5 users, right? The environment >> variable gets set and then ignored, so the app would behave exactly >> the same way. If they want to use the new cleanup code, they can >> upgrade rack. >=20 > Right, this only affects 1.6 users. 1.5 users will need to upgrade for > this.