From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6562B1F934 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id q22so3178656qkq.6 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:44:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blakewilliams-me.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZfGhDWTG8BR5YJGX+RvVdUh+Xw/AXHVFimC2MgpGTlA=; b=kbMUC7lCyEsbxSxZHWur2DxRSRrFH7soqWL70gSdWhxInKhMV5I86ZuJR9PD5CwzTz rpZjbWSU08Jm/GEi0zBi4B/ABRI+xJxu1cW0jSg7J4NCm7IAV0WUBo1bBvR/LHcBJ/2P 2T+pjqnwYHFWChJep/pE0GClZ8uzj53eW3F+DujPZ76uTPC7WBm6xkf7fawIknzZ8ICf 5Utc9SHagKohHVfBpQMwTCba3bYuyv+2DXXFgnFD5/AQ/er3PrGFZLrb+WAVJKOady2j 1m3qh7UvJYVFHtNmOGeTvDRnz0aBLQwJvHFy2vUunKH5Y5H4nkhLWPaFJz5ccwQC1T+a enew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZfGhDWTG8BR5YJGX+RvVdUh+Xw/AXHVFimC2MgpGTlA=; b=ljDykepQP+I7T/L3Pm4bBGpocVvUv7F3Zrx3y2ww1ReiojB0c7zocMG0FLODxpvlb7 Ysx4JW0xAl4wRMXxzqF9dY/xS1fCGR4x3j6YaTIMcZMhlzHhZ48fulrqOfOzAV/+IQE9 SnCTt88ZRhNKKIyqaFShGEcdnA5AMGPBx84fXtDN1IHW1HO90EiWXfD4u4UIbKBjahG5 R7fl+mU2tNuoeSsptlG1hb0wZ4vnNd6igr0/5b5LHWoCQh1tEkgRnPlWp3QVV589hS7K /EiBxlqh0F1Mrl2l/pWiC8S6KM7DWXL2B8Zlp+hGM1j/aDJutstQxCYg7R54enuk9Mfp DYUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PGBw+TztV9IlAD9umEmFjfF7yOFBRA0e90f/PQ4aLHmW+RmqY 23MmB5FQ7yFC098Y+cr5fSyuUvkf77QihrW7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLy05mvCO4AgOZuwE1/vzBGO1jfgE9mcHrKwo/ExCPdv4kIbvFDeRz5jh6mJEVSL7zeTytaw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:478f:: with SMTP id u137mr5816092qka.16.1607557490135; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.86] (inet-64-112-182-228.bos.netblazr.com. [64.112.182.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm2273538qkm.71.2020.12.09.15.44.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:44:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add rack.after_reply functionality From: Blake Williams In-Reply-To: <20201209221839.GA15862@dcvr> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:44:48 -0500 Cc: unicorn-public@yhbt.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <9873E53C-04D3-4759-9678-CA17DBAEF7B7@blakewilliams.me> <20201208224631.GA13148@dcvr> <20201209094344.GA25593@dcvr> <20201209221839.GA15862@dcvr> To: Eric Wong X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) List-Id: > Thanks, pushed to https://yhbt.net/unicorn.git as > commit 673c15e3f020bccc0336838617875b26c9a45f4e > with Puma noted (see below) and extra `env' check added. >=20 > Anything else? Will wait a few days/week for others to chime in > and probably cut 5.8 in a week or so. Thanks, that should be everything on my end. Looking forward to the release. > Btw, a sidenote about some strangeness in your mail replies: >=20 > I'm not sure why, but your "Reply-To" header is set to the > unbracketed Message-ID ("20201209094344.GA25593@dcvr") of the > message, which makes no sense... >=20 > I wonder if you or your mail client is confusing "Reply-To:" > with the "In-Reply-To:" header. They're completely different: > "Reply-To:" should be an email address you control (not a > Message-ID) if it differs from what's in the "From:" header. >=20 > In any case, your mail client already sets the "References:" > header correctly (probably w/o any interaction on your part), > and the "In-Reply-To:" header is not necessary (and it needs > angle brackets, anyways, since comments are allowed). >=20 > cf. https://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html Strange, thanks for the heads up. I=E2=80=99ve updated the settings, so hopefully that issue is resolved.=