From: Sam Saffron <sam.saffron@gmail.com>
To: "Bráulio Bhavamitra" <braulio@eita.org.br>
Cc: unicorn-public <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>,
Hitendra Hugo Melo <hitendra@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: No, passenger 5.0 is not faster than unicorn :)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 20:56:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAtdryN-wgOBvaYOv7moUFxsZ67Dtu+40AVMGbYCBohwE7HC8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJri6_uarn+vrr_TN07SzyFzR07hDN-z79rBcDe=8VPxOL4mVQ@mail.gmail.com>
I covered this here:
http://discuss.topazlabs.com/t/amidst-blizzards-they-rest/1147
it seems like an odd marketing move to me ... optimising a bit that
needs very little help. heck ripping out hashie and the 50 frames
omniauth injects would have a significantly bigger impact on rails
apps out there than optimising the 0.5% that needs little optimising.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra <braulio@eita.org.br> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've just tested a one instance each (one worker with unicorn and
> --max-pool-size 1 passenger 5) on the rails app I work.
>
> And the results are just as I expected, no miracle at all: Unicorn is
> still the fatest!
> (the difference is only a few milliseconds less per request)
>
> The blocking design of unicorn is proving itself very efficient.
>
> cheers!
> bráulio
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 9:50 No, passenger 5.0 is not faster than unicorn :) Bráulio Bhavamitra
2014-12-03 9:56 ` Sam Saffron [this message]
2014-12-03 9:57 ` Sam Saffron
2014-12-03 11:00 ` Hongli Lai
2014-12-03 11:05 ` Sam Saffron
2014-12-03 12:42 ` Xavier Noria
2014-12-03 14:10 ` Bráulio Bhavamitra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://yhbt.net/unicorn/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAtdryN-wgOBvaYOv7moUFxsZ67Dtu+40AVMGbYCBohwE7HC8g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sam.saffron@gmail.com \
--cc=braulio@eita.org.br \
--cc=hitendra@riseup.net \
--cc=unicorn-public@bogomips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhbt.net/unicorn.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).