From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mfischer@zendesk.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED
 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
 C43EB1F89E for <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>; Thu,  9 Oct 2014 17:59:43 +0000
 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id dc16so547945qab.7 for
 <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
 s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=WjBwAHNDIn4i2E5/l+1SaDLDASmDDsPaCxtXPmlHmLY=;
 b=AvhXlCOMJ1uJ1jKDIe93EVqkZxHkQx8UIIemIKCq1VamDGrCTDaGyRXiRRRjSVKgN0
 F3JvzSemw+NfokOkE+MBW9EBrDGDlCGqTrY3QUsKdsDudAaw6ty51oFmzvliYqeX+KKT
 U64UK2C6JNdcqwtMWa08yVrFRlfBvXWRyPGgSFoANd667nyc/zgT9uq7n0m/S6vN9upK
 T9tllK5onLELUYOuN1RjzwOdc0OIGH8P+s2RdnW+UOBeCRnrAfP83W6Om7TvtQ8Z92sG
 wkBuXFdOeZj6kIetHg0ZUd227ai7eyXWZUYEcX7OODoVc61O7QCPEMbMfQof6CYweEag MolQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:
 ALoCoQmQJvI6m4+hB6I+6MJlnO9D4odebyeIDZ8Hvwgb0HT4BlFV2gsPXwoWtKZLcDikufIims2u
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr26131275qci.22.1412877582589;
 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.107.139 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
 <CAJri6_uURN=_q8dHs+zEZryVkFQpNzaFEH8SvrXSUokhEmPTaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAJri6_sXnNp+eRFZHSNCiZYqh=nw+cSUfNa1c4AjxLAhPVRXvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABHxtY7nRPP50a+-Ok02pDW3dJWA0CJc9C5hq+8e8wP+rBt57A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJri6_uURN=_q8dHs+zEZryVkFQpNzaFEH8SvrXSUokhEmPTaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:59:42 -0700
Message-ID:
 <CABHxtY53pGMxTM-D29vZ+1oYsFHm7AvTcJLi=3xMMvOZVX-S-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reserved workers not as webservers
From: Michael Fischer <mfischer@zendesk.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A1ulio_Bhavamitra?= <braulio@eita.org.br>
Cc: unicorn-public <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: PublicInbox::Filter 0.0.1
List-Id: <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Br=C3=A1ulio Bhavamitra <braulio@eita.org.=
br>
wrote:

As being forked process, I never saw a worker problem crashing master
> or other workers.


Process isolation is one thing, but that's not the same thing as system
isolation.  Imagine your worker process has a memory leak and in response,
the kernel's OOM killer decides to kill your webserver children.

--Michael