From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39AD1FB36 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so9550762qgf.35 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lwVe3ccxPRrXPY+9ELX/RT/6UNob8yie3Q0ngIQIY78=; b=b4UVyLvAgoAo9O9AZFMoKZsmoNI5lxGriD0Lq3aASuSltUXi5mhAsfv+rrJ2TQ+TKo Epg/O0+8Od7Wob2dZcO/0ZcLIztyX/MJCALfOtamFHZ3eK5vGYIqAXq+7BtLheeyWAMV 9/6vWfbNhKSQyP2OQC7DwypfQq+NeWWIDAVWYfbUOcAvSN5uUMZAtPPRCxjMgO5h7oZf h0RbSNXZ5XSpcyuzaIkjCIiijbbLtmpUH0XbtSB+wOeee0fCphWZieqb3Xq4IOw7NQSl hRLlqJqM+HvhJv/zbIDM3SftpSukuAcgb4SnP7lo+TZpdhQSprLS9q73jsiIDCe4qR+b dFoA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVOZtaF0rCaambvMywQ3rwUy89z0/0sDKILm8YeuAIU1jg3/U5/sNtN6CBOzBKORYzZkLZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.21.9 with SMTP id h9mr39293400qab.67.1407182764627; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.102.200 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140804194508.GB31366@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20140804183923.GA8732@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20140804191158.GB10070@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20140804194508.GB31366@dcvr.yhbt.net> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:06:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Weird Unicorn Timeout Issues (Hibernation problem?) From: Michael Fischer To: Eric Wong Cc: Tony Devlin , unicorn-public Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: PublicInbox::Filter 0.0.1 List-Id: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Eric Wong wrote: [1] Perhaps persistent connections will be an option in the future > if the support/documentation overhead is worth it, as nginx > supports persistent connections to backends nowadays. > I don't believe the added complexity is worth the effort. --Michael