From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB331FEC6 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ty20so3738911lab.18 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:26:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.157.68 with SMTP id wk4mr9129235lbb.85.1406935593896; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.183.196 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:26:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140801213202.GA2729@dcvr.yhbt.net> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:26:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please move to github From: Daniel Evans To: Michael Grosser Cc: Xavier Noria , Gabe da Silveira , Eric Wong , "unicorn-public@bogomips.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: This brings back memories of the BitKeeper debacle with the Linux kernel. One of the reasons git exists is because a large open source project trusted a proprietary product and it got ripped out from underneath them. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Michael Grosser wrote: > > Patch coming soon, already pinpointed it, just wanted to look at the > issues to see if someone already solved it when I noticed that it's > not on github. > > But yeah otherwise, use whatever you like, chances are you do the most > work here anyway ;) > > As far as I am concerned any other OS/self-hosted tool like gitlab etc > would also be an improvement. > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Xavier Noria wrote: > > Guys, Eric has obviously made a conscious choice by not hosting the source > > code on GitHub, and his rationale is clear. > > > > Eric I for one respect and understand your point of view, and think you have > > the right to do whatever you want with your projects. Thanks a lot for your > > open source and your integrity. > > > -- Daniel Evans