From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS30496 65.99.224.0/20 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from jackson.asmallorange.com (jackson.asmallorange.com [65.99.237.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF28D1FD74 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 10:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.217.177]:43863) by jackson.asmallorange.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XQZT3-0000Rg-NQ for unicorn-public@bogomips.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 06:13:09 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l4so2859629lbv.22 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.5.40 with SMTP id p8mr22665954lap.32.1410084788002; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.64.232 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 03:12:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140903171143.GA21278@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20140903171143.GA21278@dcvr.yhbt.net> From: Jonathan del Strother Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 11:12:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: fork() errors lead to a completely dead unicorn To: Eric Wong Cc: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - jackson.asmallorange.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bogomips.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - steelskies.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: jackson.asmallorange.com: authenticated_id: maillist@steelskies.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: List-Id: Just wanted to say thanks for the reply - I've been trying to figure this out over the weekend and not succeeding. I can't seem to reproduce it in a self-contained environment, it only ever happens in production, which is making debugging a bit frustrating... > >> I, [2014-09-03T08:51:48.876341 #10484] INFO -- : master complete > > But the original master does not die after this? 99% sure it doesn't - it just sits there in a zombie state with no workers. But I want to verify that, so I guess I'm stuck waiting until it happens in production again. Will let you know.