From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040541F7CA for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id uy5so34362011obc.4 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 04:18:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.202.90.84 with SMTP id o81mr2535025oib.6.1419596311163; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 04:18:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.85.68 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 04:17:50 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A1ulio_Bhavamitra?= Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Rails/Unicorn comparizon between ruby 2.1.5 and ruby 2.2.0 To: unicorn-public , ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Hello all, A quick comparison the average GC time per request reported by Newrelic: Ruby 2.1.5, Rails 3.2.21 and Unicorn: ~15ms Ruby 2.1.5 (with gctools middleware), Rails 3.2.21 and Unicorn: ~4ms Ruby 2.2.0, Rails 3.2.21 and Unicorn: ~8ms We see that ruby 2.2.0 improved, but still an out-of-band is even better. cheers, br=C3=A1ulio