From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C521F5D9 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wo20so3962554obc.41 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:51:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.202.12.11 with SMTP id 11mr2211402oim.83.1417600280820; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:51:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: brauliobo@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.85.68 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 01:50:40 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A1ulio_Bhavamitra?= Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 06:50:40 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: spC6P6F_sV34QgSjZNPqQ5FwNqo Message-ID: Subject: No, passenger 5.0 is not faster than unicorn :) To: unicorn-public , Hitendra Hugo Melo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Hello all, I've just tested a one instance each (one worker with unicorn and --max-pool-size 1 passenger 5) on the rails app I work. And the results are just as I expected, no miracle at all: Unicorn is still the fatest! (the difference is only a few milliseconds less per request) The blocking design of unicorn is proving itself very efficient. cheers! br=C3=A1ulio