From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-qg0-f47.google.com (mail-qg0-f47.google.com [209.85.192.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8E41FB58 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i50so9397283qgf.34 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:41:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.93.11 with SMTP id t11mr40215155qam.102.1407177708977; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.25.147 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:41:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140804183923.GA8732@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20140804183923.GA8732@dcvr.yhbt.net> From: Kapil Israni Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:41:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Weird Unicorn Timeout Issues (Hibernation problem?) To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: PublicInbox::Filter 0.0.1 List-Id: I unsubscribed from this list few days back, still getting emails? On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Eric Wong wrote: > Tony Devlin wrote: > > We have an issue where if a site is not accessed for around (average) 30 > > minutes the next query will timeout, and it will timeout on all the > workers > > opened. IE: If I have two workers, then both of those workers will > > timeout, even if the first one, > > after timeout, starts to work. As soon as the second worker is called > upon > > it will timeout. Then everything runs perfectly good and great until the > > site is not accessed for 30 minutes or more. Then the timeout issue > starts > > all over again. > > This sounds like the idle timeout for MySQL (or similar) kicking in. > What database(s) or other backends are you using? > > That said, we've had problems with hibernate/suspend in the past, > so I'll double check. > > -- Kapil