From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS8075 157.55.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from DUB004-OMC3S6.hotmail.com (dub004-omc3s6.hotmail.com [157.55.2.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0FD633805 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB126-W95 ([157.55.2.7]) by DUB004-OMC3S6.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:36:20 -0800 X-TMN: [XCXDO63Hc8ndNtGc1++ZbWhGWYaeQjAj] X-Originating-Email: [roberto.chingon@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Roberto Cordoba del Moral To: Eric Wong CC: "unicorn-public@bogomips.org" Subject: RE: Issue with Unicorn: Big latency when getting a request Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:36:20 +0100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20141114183434.GA1177@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20141114071922.GA10410@dcvr.yhbt.net>,,,<20141114100208.GA7416@dcvr.yhbt.net>,,,<20141114102857.GA13910@dcvr.yhbt.net>,,<20141114110306.GA21328@dcvr.yhbt.net>,,<20141114183434.GA1177@dcvr.yhbt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2014 22:36:20.0502 (UTC) FILETIME=[6974A360:01D0005B] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: PublicInbox::Filter 0.0.1 List-Id: I have tested with 5 workers and still the same issue. It=B4s strange=2C If this is happening to everyone=2C it should be a more k= nown problem. I have search everywhere in Internet and I couldn=B4t find an= ything related to it. My guess is that probably I have something in my Rails code related to sess= ions or cookies that is handled in a different way in the browsers but it= =B4s also related to the application server. I don=B4t know. But although I feel really curious with the isssue and I wo= uld love to find it out=2C I think I will try with Puma. Thank you so much for your time. > Date: Fri=2C 14 Nov 2014 18:34:34 +0000 > From: e@80x24.org > To: roberto.chingon@hotmail.com > CC: unicorn-public@bogomips.org > Subject: Re: Issue with Unicorn: Big latency when getting a request >=20 > Roberto Cordoba del Moral wrote: > > I have installed Puma and it=B4s working. > > It=B4s the combination of Unicorn and Chrome which is not working. I > > don=B4t know why. >=20 > Just curious=2C can you try configuring "worker_processes 4" in unicorn > (or maybe increase 4 to 8 or any hihgher number if you have enough > memory). If extra workers works=2C it's definitely the lack of baked-in > concurrency in unicorn (this is by design). >=20 > So I suspect puma (or any other server) is better for your use case > anyways. =