From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS14383 205.234.109.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: archivist@yhbt.net Delivered-To: archivist@dcvr.yhbt.net Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63FA21273 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D465915B8033; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:42 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org Delivered-To: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0FE15B802F for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:47:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so13440841pzk.9 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:47:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=cirxKJ+Fv6ey9BNFwus5AAKe1P4b3/QpasBRCMNfm6M=; b=XqNhfJsZt2EfQm3eGceXMkY+DJpoWVQId61ruwlH+EFdRJ5h7cmR2Khmn1E+uQtHsD V5netM4CYTL4xmnnxK8OVXhnrIs1V3sFWVmfmKnRVU4Aoku3G5kfS/SiJsVPUXFSxvaI zTX3Ui14sxriSKFuxoAgcjNi59kv6aZwEBm6Y= Received: by 10.68.47.4 with SMTP id z4mr61175541pbm.39.1321379229879; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:47:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from alex-mbp-2.local (cpe-75-83-127-198.socal.res.rr.com. [75.83.127.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n4sm52380582pbo.10.2011.11.15.09.47.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:47:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:47:05 -0800 From: Alex Sharp To: unicorn list Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20111114215624.GB22715@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20111114215624.GB22715@dcvr.yhbt.net> Subject: Re: nginx + unicorn deployment survey X-Mailer: sparrow 1.4.2 (build 959.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: mongrel-unicorn-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: mongrel-unicorn-bounces@rubyforge.org We run nginx and unicorn on the same instance, behind HAProxy. We run it this way because it means fewer instances, and the nginx processes don't seem to require many system resources, so we don't have a resource constraint problem by putting them on the same instance. -- Alex Sharp Zaarly, Inc. @ajsharp | github.com/ajsharp | alexjsharp.com On Monday, November 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Eric Wong wrote: > Hello all, I'm wondering if you deploy nginx: > > 1) on the same machine that runs unicorn (exclusively proxying to that) > > 2) on a different machine that doesn't run unicorn > > 3) both, nginx could forward to either to localhost > or another host on the same LAN > > And of course, the reason(s) you chose what you chose. I'm inclined > to believe many folks are on 1) simply because they only have one > machine. > > Thanks in advance for your replies, I'm always interested in > hearing user experiences with unicorn. _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying