From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Original-To: yahns-public@yhbt.net
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070FE1FD0A; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:21:04 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: yahns-public@yhbt.net
Subject: Re: [WIP] proxy_pass: experiment to disable buffer sharing
Message-ID: <20150417022104.GA17767@dcvr.yhbt.net>
References: <20150414213140.GA6061@dcvr.yhbt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150414213140.GA6061@dcvr.yhbt.net>
List-Id: <yahns-public@yhbt.net>

Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
> Will run this for a few days to see if there's still segfaults
> with the proxy code.  Multithreading is tricky...

Nope.  I spotted a definite problem elsewhere, and it's definitely
tricky with the way the full rack.request hijack API works.

I think switching to response-only hijacking will solve the problem,
though.