Re: [RFC] remove documentation for client_*_buffer_size knobs

["Lin Jen-Shin (godfat)" <godfat@godfat.org>]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
[...]
> In the future, we may remove these options entirely.  For now,
> having too much documentation and tuning options may confuse new
> users and minimize the importance/visibility of other options,
> so remove documentation for this.
>
> I'm not convinced user-space buffer size tuning has a place in
> an application server written in a high-level language.  Heck,
> many servers written in C do not have this.

Personally I do like various options even if I won't touch them,
since maybe I'll on some day. We could put more advanced
options in advanced configuration page to avoid confusion.
Or a warning like "Don't touch them unless you really know
what you're doing" should be good (scary) enough.

However, I don't know if it makes sense to configure
client_header_buffer_size and client_max_body_size.
(nginx has them, I think?) If not, I guess it's really fine to
remove them, and we're free to change them or stop
providing those options in the future. That's also good, I guess.