From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, linux@roeck-us.net,
jiri@resnulli.us, sfeldma@gmail.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] net: L2 only interfaces
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:50:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440543015-14693-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
This patch series implements a L2 only interface concept which basically denies
any kind of IP address configuration on these interfaces, but still allows them
to be used as configuration end-points to keep using ethtool and friends.
A cleaner approach might be to finally come up with the concept of net_port
which a net_device would be a superset of, but this still raises tons of
questions as to whether we should be modifying userland tools to be able to
configure/query these interfaces. During all the switch talks/discussions last
year, it seemed to me like th L2-only interface is closest we have to a
"network port".
Comments, flames, flying tomatoes welcome!
Florian Fainelli (5):
net: add IFF_L2_ONLY flag
net: ipv4: Skip in_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
net: ipv6: Skip in6_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
net: dsa: Flag slave network devices with IFF_L2_ONLY
net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Allow disabling tagging protocol
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
include/uapi/linux/if.h | 5 ++++-
net/dsa/slave.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/devinet.c | 3 +++
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 22:50 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-08-25 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] net: add IFF_L2_ONLY flag Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] net: ipv4: Skip in_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] net: ipv6: Skip in6_dev " Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] net: dsa: Flag slave network devices with IFF_L2_ONLY Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Allow disabling tagging protocol Florian Fainelli
2015-08-26 0:09 ` David Miller
2015-08-25 23:20 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] net: L2 only interfaces Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-25 23:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 23:33 ` David Ahern
2015-09-01 17:07 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-08-25 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-08-25 23:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-08-25 23:44 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-08-25 23:52 ` David Ahern
2015-08-26 0:05 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-08-26 0:12 ` David Miller
2015-08-26 4:24 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-08-26 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-08-26 17:56 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-08-26 17:32 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440543015-14693-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.