From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: trap packets from standalone ports to the CPU
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729152805.o2pur7pp2kpxvvnq@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728175327.1150120-3-dqfext@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:53:26AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> MT7530's FDB has 8 filter IDs, but they are only available for shared
> VLAN learning, and all VLAN-unaware ports use 0 as the default filter
> ID.
Actually, on second thought...
If MT7530 supports 8 FIDs and it has 7 ports, then you can assign one
FID to each standalone port or VLAN-unaware bridge it is a member of.
The drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c driver has a
similar concept, only instead of FID, it manages FDB IDs - each port is
assigned to an FDB ID and it learns and looks up MAC addresses only
within that FDB ID. Every standalone port uses its own fdb_id, and every
port under the same bridge shares the same fdb_id (the fdb_id associated
with a bridge is equal with the fdb_id of the first standalone port that
joins that bridge; every other standalone port that joins a bridge will
change its fdb_id to that of the bridge). When a port leaves a bridge
and becomes standalone again, its fdb_id will again change to the first
unused value. My point is that if you search for "fdb_id" in that driver
you will maybe find some inspiration for how things like this can be
managed. I know it's not 100% the same as your situation (the FDBs in
the dpaa2-switch are selected by the VLAN table, and for that reason,
the dpaa2-switch can only operate as VLAN-aware, and with shared VLAN
learning per FDB), but the same concept can be reused, I think. With
each port and VLAN-unaware bridge having its own FID, I think you will
not have the shortcircuit issue any longer (and with VLAN-aware bridges
you shouldn't have it anyway).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: trap packets from standalone ports to the CPU
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729152805.o2pur7pp2kpxvvnq@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728175327.1150120-3-dqfext@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:53:26AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> MT7530's FDB has 8 filter IDs, but they are only available for shared
> VLAN learning, and all VLAN-unaware ports use 0 as the default filter
> ID.
Actually, on second thought...
If MT7530 supports 8 FIDs and it has 7 ports, then you can assign one
FID to each standalone port or VLAN-unaware bridge it is a member of.
The drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c driver has a
similar concept, only instead of FID, it manages FDB IDs - each port is
assigned to an FDB ID and it learns and looks up MAC addresses only
within that FDB ID. Every standalone port uses its own fdb_id, and every
port under the same bridge shares the same fdb_id (the fdb_id associated
with a bridge is equal with the fdb_id of the first standalone port that
joins that bridge; every other standalone port that joins a bridge will
change its fdb_id to that of the bridge). When a port leaves a bridge
and becomes standalone again, its fdb_id will again change to the first
unused value. My point is that if you search for "fdb_id" in that driver
you will maybe find some inspiration for how things like this can be
managed. I know it's not 100% the same as your situation (the FDBs in
the dpaa2-switch are selected by the VLAN table, and for that reason,
the dpaa2-switch can only operate as VLAN-aware, and with shared VLAN
learning per FDB), but the same concept can be reused, I think. With
each port and VLAN-unaware bridge having its own FID, I think you will
not have the shortcircuit issue any longer (and with VLAN-aware bridges
you shouldn't have it anyway).
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: trap packets from standalone ports to the CPU
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729152805.o2pur7pp2kpxvvnq@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728175327.1150120-3-dqfext@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:53:26AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> MT7530's FDB has 8 filter IDs, but they are only available for shared
> VLAN learning, and all VLAN-unaware ports use 0 as the default filter
> ID.
Actually, on second thought...
If MT7530 supports 8 FIDs and it has 7 ports, then you can assign one
FID to each standalone port or VLAN-unaware bridge it is a member of.
The drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c driver has a
similar concept, only instead of FID, it manages FDB IDs - each port is
assigned to an FDB ID and it learns and looks up MAC addresses only
within that FDB ID. Every standalone port uses its own fdb_id, and every
port under the same bridge shares the same fdb_id (the fdb_id associated
with a bridge is equal with the fdb_id of the first standalone port that
joins that bridge; every other standalone port that joins a bridge will
change its fdb_id to that of the bridge). When a port leaves a bridge
and becomes standalone again, its fdb_id will again change to the first
unused value. My point is that if you search for "fdb_id" in that driver
you will maybe find some inspiration for how things like this can be
managed. I know it's not 100% the same as your situation (the FDBs in
the dpaa2-switch are selected by the VLAN table, and for that reason,
the dpaa2-switch can only operate as VLAN-aware, and with shared VLAN
learning per FDB), but the same concept can be reused, I think. With
each port and VLAN-unaware bridge having its own FID, I think you will
not have the shortcircuit issue any longer (and with VLAN-aware bridges
you shouldn't have it anyway).
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 17:53 [RFC net-next 0/2] mt7530 software fallback bridging fix DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` [RFC net-next 1/2] net: dsa: tag_mtk: skip address learning on transmit to standalone ports DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 18:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 16:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 16:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 16:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:32 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:32 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:32 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:39 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:39 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:39 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:00 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:00 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:00 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 19:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 19:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 19:25 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:25 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:25 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 19:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 19:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 19:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 17:53 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: trap packets from standalone ports to the CPU DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 17:53 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 18:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-29 15:28 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-07-29 15:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-29 15:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-29 16:11 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-29 16:11 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-29 16:11 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-29 16:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-29 16:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-29 16:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 15:45 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 15:45 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 15:45 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 16:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 16:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 16:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:21 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:21 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:21 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-30 17:51 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:51 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-30 17:51 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-28 18:08 ` [RFC net-next 0/2] mt7530 software fallback bridging fix Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-28 18:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210729152805.o2pur7pp2kpxvvnq@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.