From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> gic_acpi_match_gicc() is only called via gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(). It should only count the number of enabled redistributors, but it also tries to sanity check the GICC entry, currently returning an error if the Enabled bit is set, but the gicr_base_address is zero. Adding support for the online-capable bit to the sanity check will complicate it, for no benefit. The existing check implicitly depends on gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions() previous failing to find any GICR regions (as it is valid to have gicr_base_address of zero if the redistributors are described via a GICR entry). Instead of complicating the check, remove it. Failures that happen at this point cause the irqchip not to register, meaning no irqs can be requested. The kernel grinds to a panic() pretty quickly. Without the check, MADT tables that exhibit this problem are still caught by gic_populate_rdist(), which helpfully also prints what went wrong: | CPU4: mpidr 100 has no re-distributor! Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> --- v5: No change --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 6fb276504bcc..10af15f93d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2415,19 +2415,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means * GICR base is presented via GICC */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) { + if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; - return 0; - } - /* - * It's perfectly valid firmware can pass disabled GICC entry, driver - * should not treat as errors, skip the entry instead of probe fail. - */ - if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) - return 0; - - return -ENODEV; + return 0; } static int __init gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(void) -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> gic_acpi_match_gicc() is only called via gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(). It should only count the number of enabled redistributors, but it also tries to sanity check the GICC entry, currently returning an error if the Enabled bit is set, but the gicr_base_address is zero. Adding support for the online-capable bit to the sanity check will complicate it, for no benefit. The existing check implicitly depends on gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions() previous failing to find any GICR regions (as it is valid to have gicr_base_address of zero if the redistributors are described via a GICR entry). Instead of complicating the check, remove it. Failures that happen at this point cause the irqchip not to register, meaning no irqs can be requested. The kernel grinds to a panic() pretty quickly. Without the check, MADT tables that exhibit this problem are still caught by gic_populate_rdist(), which helpfully also prints what went wrong: | CPU4: mpidr 100 has no re-distributor! Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> --- v5: No change --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 6fb276504bcc..10af15f93d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2415,19 +2415,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means * GICR base is presented via GICC */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) { + if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; - return 0; - } - /* - * It's perfectly valid firmware can pass disabled GICC entry, driver - * should not treat as errors, skip the entry instead of probe fail. - */ - if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) - return 0; - - return -ENODEV; + return 0; } static int __init gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(void) -- 2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 14:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-04-12 14:37 [PATCH v5 00/18] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 17:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-12 17:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-22 3:53 ` Gavin Shan 2024-04-22 3:53 ` Gavin Shan 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI: processor: Set the ACPI_COMPANION for the struct cpu instance Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-12 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 15:48 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 15:48 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 16:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 16:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 17:34 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 17:34 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 17:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-16 17:35 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-16 17:35 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-12 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-12 20:16 ` Russell King (Oracle) 2024-04-12 20:16 ` Russell King (Oracle) 2024-04-12 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner 2024-04-12 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner 2024-04-12 21:52 ` Russell King (Oracle) 2024-04-12 21:52 ` Russell King (Oracle) 2024-04-12 23:23 ` Thomas Gleixner 2024-04-12 23:23 ` Thomas Gleixner 2024-04-15 8:45 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 8:45 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 9:16 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 9:16 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 9:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 9:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 11:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 11:56 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:56 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 12:23 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 12:23 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-16 17:41 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-16 17:41 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-16 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-16 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-17 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-17 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 12:37 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 12:37 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 12:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 12:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 11:51 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 11:51 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 12:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 12:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 15:31 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 15:31 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-17 15:01 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-17 15:01 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-17 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-17 16:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 10:52 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 10:52 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-15 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2024-04-15 11:07 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-15 11:07 ` Salil Mehta 2024-04-16 14:00 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-16 14:00 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ACPI: utils: Add an acpi_sta_enabled() helper and use it in acpi_processor_make_present() Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED() Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message] 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to allow checking of ACPI _STA Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ACPI: add support to (un)register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron 2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240412143719.11398-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \ --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \ --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \ --cc=justin.he@arm.com \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \ --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.