All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:31:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21923.52187.738764.317319@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436788907-1921-18-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream"):
...
> + * PHASE_NORMAL:
> + *   This phase is used for regular migration or resume from file.
> + *   Records are read one at time and immediately processed.  (The
> + *   record queue will not contain more than a single record.)

I see that you added better comments about the record state later in
the series, thanks.

I'm not entirely sure that it was right for that to be added later,
but I'm not going to quibble about its location in the series.  I am
however going to comment on the content:

 * Internal states:
 *                  running  in_checkpoint  phase
 * Undefined          -        -              -
 * Idle               false    false          -
 * Active             true     false          normal
 * Checkpoint(buf)    true     true           buffering
 * Checkpoint(unbuf)  true     true           unbuffering
 * Active             true     false          normal
 * Finished           false    false          -

The `Active' line here appears twice.  Surely some mistake.

What is the difference between Finished and Idle ?  I think none ?  So
Finished doesn't belong here.

Also you should probably explictly say that Checkpoint is a variant of
Active, from the outside.  (You don't explicitly list the outside
states, but as I say I think they are the usual Undefined / Idle /
Active.)

The use of `-' for `undefined value' is not proper, I think.  You
probably cribbed this from the `-' in one cell in the `spawn
implementation' comment in libxl_exec.c (near line 242).  But that `-'
means `no such object is allocated but the pointer has an undefined
value', which is rather special.

Maybe you want this instead:
 
 * Internal states:
 *             phase        running  in_checkpoint
 * Undefined   undef        undef    undef
 * Idle        undef        false    false
 * Active      NORMAL       true     false
 * Active      BUFFERING    true     true
 * Active      UNBUFFERING  true     true

I also asked for you to write down which state variables may take
which values in which state.  running and in_checkpoint are only part
of this.

For example, there is also incoming_record, and record_queue (which
may be undefined, empty, one entry, >=2 entries), and the datacopier.

Is the datacopier always active ?  I think it is except
 - when we are processing one of our own callbacks, or
 - in BUFFERING/UNBUFFERING, when process_record is setting up
   its own callbacks

Maybe you want to say in a comment that there is always _either_ a
datacopier callback to come, _or_ a callback set up by process_record.


> +static void stream_continue(libxl__egc *egc,
> +                            libxl__stream_read_state *stream)
> +{
...
> +    switch (stream->phase) {
> +    case SRS_PHASE_NORMAL:
> +        /*
> +         * Normal phase (regular migration or restore from file):
> +         *
> +         * logically:
> +         *   do { read_record(); process_record(); } while ( not END );
> +         *
> +         * Alternate between reading a record from the stream, and
> +         * processing the record.  There should never be two records
> +         * in the queue.
> +         */
> +        if (LIBXL_STAILQ_EMPTY(&stream->record_queue))
> +            setup_read_record(egc, stream);
> +        else {
> +            if (process_record(egc, stream))
> +                setup_read_record(egc, stream);

Weren't you going to add an assert here, that the queue is empty ?


Last time I wrote:

  > +    libxl__sr_record_buf *incoming_record;
  > +    LIBXL_STAILQ_HEAD(, libxl__sr_record_buf) record_queue;

  This comes from malloc, not from the gc.  That needs a comment.  (Is
  the same true of incoming_record ?  I think it is.)

I don't see that comment.  You have moved incoming_record away
record_queue so now it needs two comments.


Thanks,
Ian.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 12:01 [PATCH v3 00/27] Libxl migration v2 Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] bsd-sys-queue-h-seddery: Massage `offsetof' Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] tools/libxc: Always compile the compat qemu variables into xc_sr_context Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] tools/libxl: Introduce ROUNDUP() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] tools/libxl: Introduce libxl__kill() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] tools/libxl: Stash all restore parameters in domain_create_state Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] tools/libxl: Split libxl__domain_create_state.restore_fd in two Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] tools/libxl: Extra management APIs for the save helper Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:21   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 15:01   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] tools/libxl: Add save_helper_state pointers to libxl__xc_domain_{save, restore}() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:24   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] tools/xl: Mandatory flag indicating the format of the migration stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] docs: Libxl migration v2 stream specification Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] tools/python: Libxc migration v2 infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] tools/python: Libxl " Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] tools/python: Other migration infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] tools/python: Verification utility for v2 stream spec compliance Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] tools/python: Conversion utility for legacy migration streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] tools/libxl: Migration v2 stream format Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:42   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 13:53     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:11       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 14:03     ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 14:31   ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2015-07-13 14:53     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:33       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:08   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:13     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:35       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure to convert a legacy stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:45   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:44       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:53         ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:56           ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 16:04           ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] tools/libxl: Convert a legacy stream if needed Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:51   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:20     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:44       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] tools/libxc+libxl+xl: Restore v2 streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:02   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for writing a v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:09   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:21   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:47       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:56         ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] tools/libxc+libxl+xl: Save v2 streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:25   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] docs/libxl: Introduce CHECKPOINT_END to support migration v2 remus streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] tools/libxl: Write checkpoint records into the stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] tools/libx{c, l}: Introduce restore_callbacks.checkpoint() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] tools/libxl: Handle checkpoint records in a libxl migration v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:53   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-14 10:33   ` Yang Hongyang
2015-07-14 10:35     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] tools/libxc: Drop all XG_LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT code from libxc Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] tools/libxl: Drop all knowledge of toolstack callbacks Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:55   ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21923.52187.738764.317319@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.