All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:33:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21923.55906.835814.413355@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A3D0DE.3070905@citrix.com>

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream"):
> On 13/07/15 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For example, there is also incoming_record, and record_queue (which
> > may be undefined, empty, one entry, >=2 entries), and the datacopier.
> 
> These cannot be expressed in the above terms.
> 
> incoming_record (as already noted in libxl_internal.h) is only used
> while reading a record, which happens in both Active/NORMAL and
> Active/BUFFERING
> 
> record_queue is strictly 0 or 1 entries during NORMAL, grows from 0 to
> >=1 during BUFFERING, and shrinks back to 0 during UNBUFFERING.
> 
> How would you go about expressing this without a state transition
> diagram? (I really don't think an ascii art state transition diagram
> will help make this any clearer)

  *          phase     running   in_         record   incoming
  *                              checkpoint  _queue   _record
  *
  * Undefined undef       undef    undef       undef    undef
  * Idle      undef       false    false       0        0
  * Active    NORMAL      true     false       0/1      0/partial
  * Active    BUFFERING   true     true        any      0/partial
  * Active    UNBUFFERING true     true        any      0

Adjust to taste and to correspond to facts.


> > Is the datacopier always active ?  I think it is except
> >  - when we are processing one of our own callbacks, or
> >  - in BUFFERING/UNBUFFERING, when process_record is setting up
> >    its own callbacks
> 
> The datacopier is only active while reading a record from the stream,
> but that is only (logically) half of the work to do.  It will never be
> active when processing records.
> 
> There is a second datacopier for qemu use which is only active while
> processing an EMULATOR record.

Maybe this wants to be in the table, or maybe it wants a comment next
to the variable name in the struct.


> > Maybe you want to say in a comment that there is always _either_ a
> > datacopier callback to come, _or_ a callback set up by process_record.
> 
> ok.

I'm glad that I divined correctly that this is true :-).

> >> +static void stream_continue(libxl__egc *egc,
> >> +                            libxl__stream_read_state *stream)
> >> +{
> > ...
> >> +    switch (stream->phase) {
> >> +    case SRS_PHASE_NORMAL:
> >> +        /*
> >> +         * Normal phase (regular migration or restore from file):
> >> +         *
> >> +         * logically:
> >> +         *   do { read_record(); process_record(); } while ( not END );
> >> +         *
> >> +         * Alternate between reading a record from the stream, and
> >> +         * processing the record.  There should never be two records
> >> +         * in the queue.
> >> +         */
> >> +        if (LIBXL_STAILQ_EMPTY(&stream->record_queue))
> >> +            setup_read_record(egc, stream);
> >> +        else {
> >> +            if (process_record(egc, stream))
> >> +                setup_read_record(egc, stream);
> > 
> > Weren't you going to add an assert here, that the queue is empty ?
...
> It is in the paragraph below PHASE_NORMAL, which you have snipped.

I have grepped the whole of `stream_continue' in the tip of v3 of
your series (b8bf4572) and these are the results:

    assert(stream->recursion_guard == false);
        assert(stream->in_checkpoint);
        assert(stream->in_checkpoint);
    assert(stream->recursion_guard == true);

I meant a call to assert() which ensures that after process_record in
PHASE_NORMAL, the queue is empty.

Ian.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 12:01 [PATCH v3 00/27] Libxl migration v2 Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] bsd-sys-queue-h-seddery: Massage `offsetof' Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] tools/libxc: Always compile the compat qemu variables into xc_sr_context Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] tools/libxl: Introduce ROUNDUP() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] tools/libxl: Introduce libxl__kill() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] tools/libxl: Stash all restore parameters in domain_create_state Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] tools/libxl: Split libxl__domain_create_state.restore_fd in two Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] tools/libxl: Extra management APIs for the save helper Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:21   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 15:01   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] tools/libxl: Add save_helper_state pointers to libxl__xc_domain_{save, restore}() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:24   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] tools/xl: Mandatory flag indicating the format of the migration stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] docs: Libxl migration v2 stream specification Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] tools/python: Libxc migration v2 infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] tools/python: Libxl " Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] tools/python: Other migration infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] tools/python: Verification utility for v2 stream spec compliance Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] tools/python: Conversion utility for legacy migration streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] tools/libxl: Migration v2 stream format Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for reading a libxl migration v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:42   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 13:53     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:11       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 14:03     ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 14:31   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 14:53     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:33       ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2015-07-13 15:08   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:13     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:35       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure to convert a legacy stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:45   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:44       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:53         ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:56           ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 16:04           ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] tools/libxl: Convert a legacy stream if needed Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 14:51   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:20     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:44       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] tools/libxc+libxl+xl: Restore v2 streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:02   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] tools/libxl: Infrastructure for writing a v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:09   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:21   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:47       ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 15:56         ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] tools/libxc+libxl+xl: Save v2 streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:25   ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] docs/libxl: Introduce CHECKPOINT_END to support migration v2 remus streams Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] tools/libxl: Write checkpoint records into the stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] tools/libx{c, l}: Introduce restore_callbacks.checkpoint() Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] tools/libxl: Handle checkpoint records in a libxl migration v2 stream Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 13:53   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-14 10:33   ` Yang Hongyang
2015-07-14 10:35     ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] tools/libxc: Drop all XG_LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT code from libxc Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] tools/libxl: Drop all knowledge of toolstack callbacks Andrew Cooper
2015-07-13 15:55   ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21923.55906.835814.413355@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.