From: Julien Grall <julien.grall.oss@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] evtchn: pad struct evtchn to 64 bytes
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:57:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55801D49.3030508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55802BC60200007800085766@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 16/06/15 12:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 16.06.15 at 13:14, <julien.grall@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 15/06/2015 16:48, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/sched.h b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
>>> index 44ea92d..a0ff9d2 100644
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
>>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ struct evtchn
>>> #endif
>>> } ssid;
>>> #endif
>>> -};
>>> +} __attribute__((aligned(64)));
>>
>> Why don't you use __cacheline_aligned?
>
> That would double the size on x86, for little or no benefit.
Well, the cache line size is not necessarily 64 bytes on every
architecture. In the case of ARM, the cache line depends on the
processor version.
__cacheline_aligned is the only way to ensure that the cache line is not
shared on ARM.
AFAIU, the goal of this patch is to avoid sharing the cache line. If
not, the commit message is misleading because it claims that a cache
line is always 64 bytes...
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 15:48 [PATCHv2 0/5] evtchn: Improve scalebility David Vrabel
2015-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] evtchn: factor out freeing an event channel David Vrabel
2015-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] evtchn: simplify port_is_valid() David Vrabel
2015-06-15 15:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 15:59 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] evtchn: use a per-event channel lock for sending events David Vrabel
2015-06-16 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 9:34 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 9:51 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 9:57 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 15:19 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 15:58 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 16:19 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 16:39 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-17 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] evtchn: remove the locking when unmasking an event channel David Vrabel
2015-06-16 9:19 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 9:40 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] evtchn: pad struct evtchn to 64 bytes David Vrabel
2015-06-16 9:22 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 11:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-06-16 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-16 12:57 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-06-16 13:13 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 13:27 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55801D49.3030508@gmail.com \
--to=julien.grall.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.