All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] uprobe: support for private hugetlb mappings
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:42:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <854511e0-d00c-477b-813a-3785baea846a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zip0fEliGeL0qmID@bender.morinfr.org>

On 25.04.24 17:19, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> On 24 Apr 23:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> One issue here is that FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE is not implemented for
>>> hugetlb mappings. However this was also on my TODO and I have a draft
>>> patch that implements it.
>>
>> Yes, I documented it back then and added sanity checks in GUP code to fence
>> it off. Shouldn't be too hard to implement (famous last words) and would be
>> the cleaner thing to use here once I manage to switch over to
>> FOLL_WRITE|FOLL_FORCE to break COW.
> 
> Yes, my patch seems to be working. The hugetlb code is pretty simple.
> And it allows ptrace and the proc pid mem file to work on the executable
> private hugetlb mappings.
> 
> There is one thing I am unclear about though. hugetlb enforces that
> huge_pte_write() is true on FOLL_WRITE in both the fault and
> follow_page_mask paths. I am not sure if we can simply assume in the
> hugetlb code that if the pte is not writable and this is a write fault
> then we're in the FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE case.  Or do we want to keep the
> checks simply not enforce it for FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE?
> 
> The latter is more complicated in the fault path because there is no
> FAULT_FLAG_FORCE flag.
> 

handle_mm_fault()->sanitize_fault_flags() makes sure that we'll only 
proceed with a fault either if
* we have VM_WRITE set
* we are in a COW mapping (MAP_PRIVATE with at least VM_MAYWRITE)

Once you see FAULT_FLAG_WRITE and you do have VM_WRITE, you don't care 
about FOLL_FORCE, it's simply a write fault.

Once you see FAULT_FLAG_WRITE and you *don't* have VM_WRITE, you must 
have VM_MAYWRITE and are essentially in FOLL_FORCE.

In a VMA without VM_WRITE, you must never map a PTE writable. In 
ordinary COW code, that's done in wp_page_copy(), where we *always* use 
maybe_mkwrite(), to do exactly what a write fault would do, but without 
mapping the PTE writable.

That's what the whole can_follow_write_pmd()/can_follow_write_pte() is 
about: writing to PTEs that are not writable.

You'll have to follow the exact same model in hugetlb 
(can_follow_write_pmd(), hugetlb_maybe_mkwrite(), ...).

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19 18:37 [RFC][PATCH] uprobe: support for private hugetlb mappings Guillaume Morin
2024-04-22  9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-22 18:11   ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-22 18:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-22 20:53       ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-24 20:09         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-24 20:44           ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-24 21:00             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-25 15:19               ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-25 15:42                 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-04-25 19:56                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-26  0:09                   ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-26  7:19                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-26 19:55                       ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-30 15:22                         ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-30 18:21                           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-30 18:58                             ` Guillaume Morin
2024-04-30 19:25                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-02  3:59                           ` Guillaume Morin
2024-05-16 17:44                             ` Guillaume Morin
2024-05-16 19:52                               ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=854511e0-d00c-477b-813a-3785baea846a@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=guillaume@morinfr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.