All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	tariqt@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca,
	gal@nvidia.com, nalramli@fastly.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"open list:MELLANOX MLX4 core VPI driver"
	<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/mlx4: Track RX allocation failures in a stat
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:28:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZixGk8dy8INWD6PV@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426165213.298d8409@kernel.org>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:52:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:43:53 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> > > In case of mlx4 looks like the buffer refill is "async", the driver
> > > tries to refill the buffers to max, but if it fails the next NAPI poll
> > > will try again. Allocation failures are not directly tied to packet
> > > drops. In case of bnxt if "replacement" buffer can't be allocated -
> > > packet is dropped and old buffer gets returned to the ring (although 
> > > if I'm 100% honest bnxt may be off by a couple, too, as the OOM stat
> > > gets incremented on ifup pre-fill failures).  
> > 
> > Yes, I see that now. I'll drop this patch entirely from v3 and just leave
> > the other two and remove alloc_fail from the queue stats patch.
> 
> Up to you, but I'd keep alloc_fail itself.
> If mlx4 gets page pool support one day it will be useful to run this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240426232400.624864-1-kuba@kernel.org/
> 
> And I think it's useful to be able to check in case there are Rx
> discards whether the system was also under transient memory pressure 
> or not.

Ah, maybe I read what you wrote incorrectly in your previous message.

I think you were saying that I should drop just the

  dev->stats.rx_missed_errors = dropped;

due to the definition of rx_missed_errors, but that by the definition of
rx-alloc-fail:

  alloc_fail = ring->dropped;

is still valid and can stay.

Is that right or am I just totally off?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-26 18:33 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] mlx4: Add support for netdev-genl API Joe Damato
2024-04-26 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/mlx4: Track RX allocation failures in a stat Joe Damato
2024-04-26 20:00   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-26 23:43     ` Joe Damato
2024-04-26 23:52       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-27  0:28         ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-04-27  0:34           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-26 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net/mlx4: link NAPI instances to queues and IRQs Joe Damato
2024-04-26 20:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-26 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net/mlx4: support per-queue statistics via netlink Joe Damato
2024-04-26 20:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-27  0:05     ` Joe Damato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZixGk8dy8INWD6PV@LQ3V64L9R2 \
    --to=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=nalramli@fastly.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.