All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent tpm_tis IRQ handling changes are causing kernel backtraces
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:34:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4afc566-0114-c5a3-ebda-a775132e999d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34442b17-c8e6-9d33-831f-fcbf3a38552b@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 2/11/21 2:09 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> 
> It looks like there still is an issue with the recent changes to the tpm_tis IRQ
> handling. At least I think those are the cause I did not dive any deeper,
> I just noticed that we (Fedora) have been receiving an aweful lot of
> kernel tpm_tis_send_data backtraces with most starting with tpm_tis_probe_irq_...
> 
> See for example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912167
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927610
> 
> Those are just the 3 which landed in my inbox today, for much more see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tpm_tis_send_data
> (this shows 18 bugs atm).
> 
> These were reported through the Fedora ABRT tools which automatically
> collects backtraces, the bugs have links to the ABRT reports, e.g. :
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/28155/
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/37107/
> 
> The 28155 report says that so far there have been 308,412 (ouch) automatic
> uploads of that particular variant of these backtraces
> 
> Note the second (37107) retrace report is about this happening
> on resume, rather then on probe/tpm_tis_probe_irq_... time.
> 
> Did your work on this work land in 5.10 ? Or could it be that the
> issue is an incomplete backport to the 5.10.y stable series ?

Ping ?

It is raining bug-reports about this:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tpm_tis_send_data

Currently lists 25 bugs and that is excluding bugs which have already
been marked as a duplicate.

Can someone involved in the patch-series which is causing this regression
please take a look at these kernel backtraces ?

Regards,

Hans


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-11 13:09 Recent tpm_tis IRQ handling changes are causing kernel backtraces Hans de Goede
2021-03-16 15:34 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-03-16 19:18   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-08  9:07     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-10 17:25       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-11  8:37         ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-11 23:48           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-26 19:03           ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-27 14:00             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-27 15:27               ` Hans de Goede
     [not found]                 ` <20210531043616.u3v25qzkkrik5apq@kernel.org>
2021-05-31  8:24                   ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-01 18:02                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-01 16:04                   ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-01 18:03                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-14 13:33                     ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-15 13:01                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-15 13:59                         ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-23 13:37                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-21 12:04                       ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-23 13:40                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-23 13:54                           ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-29 18:04                             ` Recent tpm_tis IRQ handling changes are causing kernel backtraces] Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-29 19:14                               ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-29 22:05                                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-30 12:47                                   ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-30 13:36                                     ` Hans de Goede
2021-07-09 18:44                                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-07-17 16:10                                         ` Hans de Goede
2021-07-27  2:50                                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4afc566-0114-c5a3-ebda-a775132e999d@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.