dri-devel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Zhu <jamesz@amd.com>
To: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Pekka Paalanen" <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Emil Velikov" <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"James Zhu" <James.Zhu@amd.com>,
	"Oded Gabbay" <ogabbay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] drm: Use XArray instead of IDR for minors
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:34:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcbfe6d5-da87-fa2b-c05a-8bea6e0004fb@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6qcxpntlr36itieyoyebsncwdv4vadr5ac7imgl4rdemoyedvp@a3m7l32pkcnf>


On 2023-08-28 17:08, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:59:26PM -0400, James Zhu wrote:
>> On 2023-07-24 17:14, Michał Winiarski wrote:
>>> IDR is deprecated, and since XArray manages its own state with internal
>>> locking, it simplifies the locking on DRM side.
>>> Additionally, don't use the IRQ-safe variant, since operating on drm
>>> minor is not done in IRQ context.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski<michal.winiarski@intel.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox<willy@infradead.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>>    1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> index 3eda026ffac6..3faecb01186f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
>>>    #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>    #include <linux/srcu.h>
>>> +#include <linux/xarray.h>
>>>    #include <drm/drm_accel.h>
>>>    #include <drm/drm_cache.h>
>>> @@ -54,8 +55,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Gareth Hughes, Leif Delgass, José Fonseca, Jon Smirl");
>>>    MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DRM shared core routines");
>>>    MODULE_LICENSE("GPL and additional rights");
>>> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(drm_minor_lock);
>>> -static struct idr drm_minors_idr;
>>> +static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(drm_minors_xa);
>>>    /*
>>>     * If the drm core fails to init for whatever reason,
>>> @@ -101,26 +101,23 @@ static struct drm_minor **drm_minor_get_slot(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>    static void drm_minor_alloc_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct drm_minor *minor = data;
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>>    	WARN_ON(dev != minor->dev);
>>>    	put_device(minor->kdev);
>>> -	if (minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL) {
>>> +	if (minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL)
>>>    		accel_minor_remove(minor->index);
>>> -	} else {
>>> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -		idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
>>> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -	}
>>> +	else
>>> +		xa_erase(&drm_minors_xa, minor->index);
>>>    }
>>> +#define DRM_MINOR_LIMIT(t) ({ typeof(t) _t = (t); XA_LIMIT(64 * _t, 64 * _t + 63); })
>>> +
>>>    static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct drm_minor *minor;
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>> -	int r;
>>> +	int index, r;
>>>    	minor = drmm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*minor), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>    	if (!minor)
>>> @@ -129,24 +126,17 @@ static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    	minor->type = type;
>>>    	minor->dev = dev;
>>> -	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
>>>    	if (type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL) {
>>>    		r = accel_minor_alloc();
>>> +		index = r;
>>>    	} else {
>>> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -		r = idr_alloc(&drm_minors_idr,
>>> -			NULL,
>>> -			64 * type,
>>> -			64 * (type + 1),
>>> -			GFP_NOWAIT);
>>> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> +		r = xa_alloc(&drm_minors_xa, &index, NULL, DRM_MINOR_LIMIT(type), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>    	}
>>> -	idr_preload_end();
>>>    	if (r < 0)
>>>    		return r;
>>> -	minor->index = r;
>>> +	minor->index = index;
>>>    	r = drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drm_minor_alloc_release, minor);
>>>    	if (r)
>>> @@ -163,7 +153,7 @@ static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    static int drm_minor_register(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct drm_minor *minor;
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>> +	void *entry;
>>>    	int ret;
>>>    	DRM_DEBUG("\n");
>>> @@ -190,9 +180,12 @@ static int drm_minor_register(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    	if (minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL) {
>>>    		accel_minor_replace(minor, minor->index);
>>>    	} else {
>>> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -		idr_replace(&drm_minors_idr, minor, minor->index);
>>> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> +		entry = xa_store(&drm_minors_xa, minor->index, minor, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +		if (xa_is_err(entry)) {
>>> +			ret = xa_err(entry);
>>> +			goto err_debugfs;
>>> +		}
>>> +		WARN_ON(entry);
>> [JZ] would WARN_ON(entry != minor)be better?
> We expect NULL here.
> The same one that was previously stored here ⌄⌄⌄
> r = xa_alloc(&drm_minors_xa, &minor->index, NULL, DRM_EXTENDED_MINOR_LIMIT, GFP_KERNEL);
> in drm_minor_alloc.
[JZ] My mistake.
>
>>>    	}
>>>    	DRM_DEBUG("new minor registered %d\n", minor->index);
>>> @@ -206,20 +199,16 @@ static int drm_minor_register(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    static void drm_minor_unregister(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type type)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct drm_minor *minor;
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>>    	minor = *drm_minor_get_slot(dev, type);
>>>    	if (!minor || !device_is_registered(minor->kdev))
>>>    		return;
>>>    	/* replace @minor with NULL so lookups will fail from now on */
>>> -	if (minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL) {
>>> +	if (minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL)
>>>    		accel_minor_replace(NULL, minor->index);
>>> -	} else {
>>> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -		idr_replace(&drm_minors_idr, NULL, minor->index);
>>> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -	}
>>> +	else
>>> +		xa_store(&drm_minors_xa, minor->index, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>    	device_del(minor->kdev);
>>>    	dev_set_drvdata(minor->kdev, NULL); /* safety belt */
>>> @@ -238,13 +227,12 @@ static void drm_minor_unregister(struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_minor_type typ
>>>    struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(unsigned int minor_id)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct drm_minor *minor;
>>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> -	minor = idr_find(&drm_minors_idr, minor_id);
>>> +	xa_lock(&drm_minors_xa);
>>> +	minor = xa_load(&drm_minors_xa, minor_id);
>>>    	if (minor)
>>>    		drm_dev_get(minor->dev);
>> [JZ] why minor->dev need ca_lock here?
> We're relying on the ordering for acquire/release (previously
> guaranteed by the drm_minor_lock, now by internal XArray locking).
> xa_load doesn't take xa_lock internally:
> https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/xarray.html#locking
[JZ] I means that drm_dev_get(minor->dev); can move out of xa_lock.
>>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
>>> +	xa_unlock(&drm_minors_xa);
>>>    	if (!minor) {
>>>    		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> @@ -1067,7 +1055,7 @@ static void drm_core_exit(void)
>>>    	unregister_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm");
>>>    	debugfs_remove(drm_debugfs_root);
>>>    	drm_sysfs_destroy();
>>> -	idr_destroy(&drm_minors_idr);
>> [JZ] Should we call xa_destroy instead here?
> We could, if we expect the xarray to potentially not be empty.
>  From what I understand - all minors should be released at this point.
[JZ] In practice,  adding destroy here will be better.
>
> Thanks,
> -Michał
>
>>> +	WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&drm_minors_xa));
>>>    	drm_connector_ida_destroy();
>>>    }
>>> @@ -1076,7 +1064,6 @@ static int __init drm_core_init(void)
>>>    	int ret;
>>>    	drm_connector_ida_init();
>>> -	idr_init(&drm_minors_idr);
>>>    	drm_memcpy_init_early();
>>>    	ret = drm_sysfs_init();

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24 21:14 [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM Michał Winiarski
2023-07-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] drm: Use XArray instead of IDR for minors Michał Winiarski
2023-08-25 16:59   ` James Zhu
2023-08-28 21:08     ` Michał Winiarski
2023-08-29 17:34       ` James Zhu [this message]
2023-08-29 18:33         ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 18:35           ` James Zhu
2023-08-29 18:37             ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] accel: " Michał Winiarski
2023-07-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] drm: Expand max DRM device number to full MINORBITS Michał Winiarski
2023-07-24 22:29   ` James Zhu
2023-07-26 18:15   ` Simon Ser
2023-07-27 12:01     ` Christian König
2023-07-28 14:22       ` Simon Ser
2023-08-08 13:55         ` Christian König
2023-08-08 15:04           ` James Zhu
2023-08-23 10:53             ` Simon Ser
2023-08-23 10:58               ` Simon Ser
2023-08-23 14:06               ` James Zhu
2023-07-24 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] drm: Introduce force_extended_minors modparam Michał Winiarski
2023-08-30 16:31 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM James Zhu
2024-05-03  1:22 ` Eric Pilmore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bcbfe6d5-da87-fa2b-c05a-8bea6e0004fb@amd.com \
    --to=jamesz@amd.com \
    --cc=James.Zhu@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
    --cc=pekka.paalanen@collabora.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).