dri-devel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
	"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
	"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Lennart Poettering" <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	"Robert Mader" <robert.mader@collabora.com>,
	"Sebastien Bacher" <sebastien.bacher@canonical.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
	"Milan Zamazal" <mzamazal@redhat.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@redhat.com>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <andrey.konovalov.ynk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Safety of opening up /dev/dma_heap/* to physically present users (udev uaccess tag) ?
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 18:09:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7ilwp3vc32xze3iu2ejgqlgz44codsktnvyiufjhuf2zxcnnf@tnwzgzoxvbg2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c0c7e7e-1530-411b-b7a4-9f13e0ff1f9e@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:34:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 5/7/24 3:32 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi dma-buf maintainers, et.al.,
> >>
> >> Various people have been working on making complex/MIPI cameras work OOTB
> >> with mainline Linux kernels and an opensource userspace stack.
> >>
> >> The generic solution adds a software ISP (for Debayering and 3A) to
> >> libcamera. Libcamera's API guarantees that buffers handed to applications
> >> using it are dma-bufs so that these can be passed to e.g. a video encoder.
> >>
> >> In order to meet this API guarantee the libcamera software ISP allocates
> >> dma-bufs from userspace through one of the /dev/dma_heap/* heaps. For
> >> the Fedora COPR repo for the PoC of this:
> >> https://hansdegoede.dreamwidth.org/28153.html
> > 
> > Is there any reason for allocating DMA buffers for libcamera through
> > /dev/dma_heap/ rather than allocating them via corresponding media
> > device and then giving them away to DRM / VPU / etc?
> > 
> > At least this should solve the permission usecase: if the app can open
> > camera device, it can allocate a buffer.
> 
> This is with a software ISP, the input buffers with raw bayer data
> come from a v4l2 device, but the output buffers with the processed
> data are purely userspace managed in this case.

Ah, I see. Then why do you require the DMA-ble buffer at all? If you are
providing data to VPU or DRM, then you should be able to get the buffer
from the data-consuming device. If the data is further processed by
a userspace app, then it should not require DMA memory at all.

My main concern is that dma-heaps is both too generic and too limiting
for the generic library implementation.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-06 11:49 Safety of opening up /dev/dma_heap/* to physically present users (udev uaccess tag) ? Hans de Goede
2024-05-06 12:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-06 12:11   ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-06 13:38   ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-06 14:01     ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-07 11:15       ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-08  5:46         ` Daniel Stone
2024-05-08  8:33           ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-08  8:38             ` Daniel Stone
2024-05-08 15:49               ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-09  9:23                 ` Daniel Stone
2024-05-16 10:18                   ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-13 13:51                 ` Simon Ser
2024-05-16 10:13                   ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-16 11:49                     ` Christian König
2024-05-07 13:34       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-07 18:59     ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-22 13:34     ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-23  9:41       ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-07 13:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-07 14:34   ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-07 15:09     ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2024-05-07 15:15       ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-05-07 15:19         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-07 18:40           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-07 19:59             ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-07 20:15               ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-08  8:39               ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-08 21:54                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-13  8:39               ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-07 17:36         ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-07 18:36           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-07 20:07             ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-05-08  8:36               ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-08 21:51                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-08 21:52                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-13  8:29                 ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-13  8:34                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-13 15:10                     ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-05-14 20:42                       ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-15 17:43                         ` nicolas.dufresne
2024-05-16 11:27                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-16 17:11                             ` nicolas.dufresne
2024-05-21  8:43                               ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-21 14:18                                 ` nicolas.dufresne
2024-05-16  7:00                         ` Simon Ser
2024-05-16 11:20                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-22 13:02                             ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-05-13 13:42                   ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-05-13 13:51                     ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-13 15:06                       ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-05-14 20:45                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-14 20:52                           ` Nicolas Dufresne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7ilwp3vc32xze3iu2ejgqlgz44codsktnvyiufjhuf2zxcnnf@tnwzgzoxvbg2 \
    --to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=andrey.konovalov.ynk@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@redhat.com \
    --cc=mzamazal@redhat.com \
    --cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=robert.mader@collabora.com \
    --cc=sebastien.bacher@canonical.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).