Linux-Fsdevel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] implement orangefs_readahead
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:31:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507388.1616833898@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210327035019.GG1719932@casper.infradead.org>

Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:

> > I've been looking at it a long time :-), I'll look more
> > tomorrow... do you see anything obvious?
> 
> Yes; Dave's sample code doesn't consume the pages from the readahead
> iterator, so the core code thinks you didn't consume them and unlocks
> / puts the pages for you.  That goes wrong, because you did actually
> consume them.  Glad I added the assertions now!

Yeah...  The cleanup function that I posted potentially happens asynchronously
from the ->readahead function, so the ractl consumption has to be done
elsewhere and may already have happened.  In the case of the code I posted
from, it's actually done in the netfs lib that's in the works:

void netfs_readahead(...)
{
...
	/* Drop the refs on the pages here rather than in the cache or
	 * filesystem.  The locks will be dropped in netfs_rreq_unlock().
	 */
	while ((page = readahead_page(ractl)))
		put_page(page);
...
}

> We should probably add something like:
> 
> static inline void readahead_consume(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> 		unsigned int nr)
> {
> 	ractl->_nr_pages -= nr;
> 	ractl->_index += nr;
> }
> 
> to indicate that you consumed the pages other than by calling
> readahead_page() or readahead_page_batch().  Or maybe Dave can
> wrap iov_iter_xarray() in a readahead_iter() macro or something
> that takes care of adjusting index & nr_pages for you.

I'm not sure either is useful for my case since iov_iter_xarray() for me isn't
being used anywhere that there's an ractl and I still have to drop the page
refs.

However, in Mike's orangefs_readahead_cleanup(), he could replace:

	rcu_read_lock();
	xas_for_each(&xas, page, last) {
		page_endio(page, false, 0);
		put_page(page);
	}
	rcu_read_unlock();

with:

	while ((page = readahead_page(ractl))) {
		page_endio(page, false, 0);
		put_page(page);
	}

maybe?

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-27  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-31 22:25 [RFC PATCH] implement orangefs_readahead Mike Marshall
2021-02-01 13:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-02  3:32   ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-13 15:31     ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Mike Marshall
2021-03-17  3:04       ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-24 11:10     ` David Howells
2021-03-27  2:55       ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-27  3:50         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-27  8:31         ` David Howells [this message]
2021-03-27 13:56           ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-27 15:40             ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-27 15:56               ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-28  3:04                 ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-29  1:51                   ` Mike Marshall
2021-03-29  9:37                   ` David Howells
2021-03-29 23:25                     ` Mike Marshall
     [not found]                       ` <3726695.1617284551@warthog.procyon.org.uk >
2021-04-13 15:08                         ` David Howells
2021-04-16 14:36                           ` Mike Marshall
2021-04-16 15:14                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-25  1:51                               ` Mike Marshall
2021-04-16 15:41                           ` David Howells
2021-04-25  1:43                             ` Mike Marshall
2021-04-25  7:49                             ` David Howells
2021-04-26 14:53                               ` Mike Marshall
2021-04-26 19:01                                 ` Mike Marshall
2021-04-26 20:01                                 ` David Howells
2021-04-26  8:37                             ` David Howells
2021-04-01 13:42                     ` David Howells
2021-04-08 20:39                       ` Mike Marshall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507388.1616833898@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).