* [PATCH] cachefiles: use private mounts in cache->mnt
@ 2021-04-05 16:46 Christian Brauner
2021-04-06 9:12 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2021-04-05 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells, linux-cachefs
Cc: linux-fsdevel, Amir Goldstein, Christian Brauner
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Since [1] we support creating private mounts from a given path's
vfsmount. This makes them very suitable for any filesystem or
filesystem functionality that piggybacks on paths of another filesystem.
Overlayfs and ecryptfs (which I'll port next) are just two such
examples.
Without trying to imply to many similarities cachefiles have one thing
in common with stacking filesystems namely that they also stack on top
of existing paths. These paths are then used as caches for a netfs.
Since private mounts aren't attached in the filesystem the aren't
affected by mount property changes after cachefiles makes use of them.
This seems a rather desirable property as the underlying path can't e.g.
suddenly go from read-write to read-only and in general it means that
cachefiles is always in full control of the underlying mount after the
user has allowed it to be used as a cache.
Besides that - and probably irrelevant from the perspective of a
cachefiles developer - it also makes things simpler for a variety of
other vfs features. One concrete example is fanotify. When the path->mnt
of the path that is used as a cache has been marked with FAN_MARK_MOUNT
the semantics get tricky as it isn't clear whether the watchers of
path->mnt should get notified about fsnotify events when files are
created by cachefilesd via path->mnt. Using a private mount let's us
elegantly handle this case too and aligns the behavior of stacks created
by overlayfs.
Reading through the codebase cachefiles currently takes path->mnt and
stashes it in cache->mnt. Everytime a cache object needs to be created,
looked-up, or in some other form interacted with cachefiles will create
a custom path comprised of cache->mnt and the relevant dentry it is
interested in:
struct path cachefiles_path = {
.mnt = cache->mnt,
.dentry = dentry,
};
So cachefiles already passes the cache->mnt through everywhere so
supporting private mounts with cachefiles is pretty simply. Instead of
recording path->mnt in cache->mnt we simply record a new private mount
we created as a copy of path->mnt via clone_private_mount() in
cache->mnt. The rest is cleanly handled by cachefiles already.
I have tested this patch with an nfs v4 export. Server on host:
/srv/nfs 10.103.182.1/24(rw,sync,crossmnt,fsid=0)
/srv/nfs/mnt 10.103.182.1/24(rw,sync)
In a vm running a kernel with this patch I first created a separate
bind-mount for /var/cache/fscache:
mount --bind /var/cache/fscache /var/cache/fscache
Then I enabled and ran cachefilesd.
and mounted the server:
mount 10.103.182.1:/mnt /mnt
and the cache worked fine! I then tried
mount -o bind,remount,ro /var/cache/fscache
and the cache continued to be working fine due to the private mount. I
don't have access to a test-suite for cachefiles though and I haven't
found one so far. If someone has a local test-suite I would very much
appreciate a test-run.
[1]: c771d683a62e ("vfs: introduce clone_private_mount()")
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/bind.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/bind.c b/fs/cachefiles/bind.c
index 38bb7764b454..ac03af93437b 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/bind.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/bind.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int cachefiles_daemon_bind(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, char *args)
static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
{
struct cachefiles_object *fsdef;
- struct path path;
+ struct path path, cache_path;
struct kstatfs stats;
struct dentry *graveyard, *cachedir, *root;
const struct cred *saved_cred;
@@ -115,16 +115,22 @@ static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
if (ret < 0)
goto error_open_root;
- cache->mnt = path.mnt;
- root = path.dentry;
+ cache->mnt = clone_private_mount(&path);
+ if (IS_ERR(cache->mnt)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(cache->mnt);
+ cache->mnt = NULL;
+ pr_warn("Failed to create private mount for file cache\n");
+ goto error_unsupported;
+ }
ret = -EINVAL;
- if (mnt_user_ns(path.mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
+ if (mnt_user_ns(cache->mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
pr_warn("File cache on idmapped mounts not supported");
goto error_unsupported;
}
/* check parameters */
+ root = path.dentry;
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (d_is_negative(root) ||
!d_backing_inode(root)->i_op->lookup ||
@@ -144,8 +150,10 @@ static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
if (ret < 0)
goto error_unsupported;
+ cache_path = path;
+ cache_path.mnt = cache->mnt;
/* get the cache size and blocksize */
- ret = vfs_statfs(&path, &stats);
+ ret = vfs_statfs(&cache_path, &stats);
if (ret < 0)
goto error_unsupported;
@@ -229,7 +237,12 @@ static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
/* done */
set_bit(CACHEFILES_READY, &cache->flags);
- dput(root);
+
+ /*
+ * We've created a private mount and we've stashed our "cache" and
+ * "graveyard" dentries so we don't need the path anymore.
+ */
+ path_put(&path);
pr_info("File cache on %s registered\n", cache->cache.identifier);
@@ -242,11 +255,11 @@ static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
dput(cache->graveyard);
cache->graveyard = NULL;
error_unsupported:
+ path_put(&path);
mntput(cache->mnt);
cache->mnt = NULL;
dput(fsdef->dentry);
fsdef->dentry = NULL;
- dput(root);
error_open_root:
kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, fsdef);
error_root_object:
base-commit: a5e13c6df0e41702d2b2c77c8ad41677ebb065b3
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cachefiles: use private mounts in cache->mnt
2021-04-05 16:46 [PATCH] cachefiles: use private mounts in cache->mnt Christian Brauner
@ 2021-04-06 9:12 ` David Howells
2021-04-06 9:49 ` Christian Brauner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2021-04-06 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: dhowells, linux-cachefs, linux-fsdevel, Amir Goldstein,
Christian Brauner
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
> Besides that - and probably irrelevant from the perspective of a
> cachefiles developer - it also makes things simpler for a variety of
> other vfs features. One concrete example is fanotify.
What about cachefilesd? That walks over the tree regularly, stats things and
maybe deletes things. Should that be in a private mount/namespace too?
> This seems a rather desirable property as the underlying path can't e.g.
> suddenly go from read-write to read-only and in general it means that
> cachefiles is always in full control of the underlying mount after the
> user has allowed it to be used as a cache.
That's not entirely true, but I guess that emergency R/O conversion isn't a
case that's worrisome - and, in any case, only affects the superblock.
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - if (mnt_user_ns(path.mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
> + if (mnt_user_ns(cache->mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
> pr_warn("File cache on idmapped mounts not supported");
> goto error_unsupported;
> }
Is it worth doing this check before calling clone_private_mount()?
> + cache_path = path;
> + cache_path.mnt = cache->mnt;
Seems pointless to copy all of path into cache_path rather than just
path.dentry.
Apart from that, looks okay.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cachefiles: use private mounts in cache->mnt
2021-04-06 9:12 ` David Howells
@ 2021-04-06 9:49 ` Christian Brauner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2021-04-06 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells
Cc: Christian Brauner, linux-cachefs, linux-fsdevel, Amir Goldstein
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:12:25AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Besides that - and probably irrelevant from the perspective of a
> > cachefiles developer - it also makes things simpler for a variety of
> > other vfs features. One concrete example is fanotify.
>
> What about cachefilesd? That walks over the tree regularly, stats things and
> maybe deletes things. Should that be in a private mount/namespace too?
You mean running the userspace cachefilesd daemon in a separate mount
namespace? I think that would make a lot of sense. Either the daemon
could manage a separate private mount namespace itself or if you support
systemd service files you could set:
PrivateMounts=yes
in the service file which:
"Takes a boolean parameter. If set, the processes of this unit will be
run in their own private file system (mount) namespace with all mount
propagation from the processes towards the host's main file system
namespace turned off. This means any file system mount points
established or removed by the unit's processes will be private to them
and not be visible to the host."
(Fwiw, Debian still ships /etc/init.d/cachefilesd which seems a bit
antique imho.)
>
> > This seems a rather desirable property as the underlying path can't e.g.
> > suddenly go from read-write to read-only and in general it means that
> > cachefiles is always in full control of the underlying mount after the
> > user has allowed it to be used as a cache.
>
> That's not entirely true, but I guess that emergency R/O conversion isn't a
> case that's worrisome - and, in any case, only affects the superblock.
>
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > - if (mnt_user_ns(path.mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
> > + if (mnt_user_ns(cache->mnt) != &init_user_ns) {
> > pr_warn("File cache on idmapped mounts not supported");
> > goto error_unsupported;
> > }
>
> Is it worth doing this check before calling clone_private_mount()?
Yes, it's safe to do that. It's just my paranoia that made me write it
this way. In order to create an idmapped mount
real_mount(&path->mnt)->mnt_ns->seq must be 0, i.e. an anonymous mount
which can't be found through the fileystem. So in order for path->mnt to
be idmapped it must be already attached to the fileystem and we don't
allow mnt_userns to change (for good reasons).
>
> > + cache_path = path;
> > + cache_path.mnt = cache->mnt;
>
> Seems pointless to copy all of path into cache_path rather than just
> path.dentry.
Sure, will change to:
cache_path.dentry = path.dentry;
cache_path.mnt = cache->mnt;
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-06 9:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-05 16:46 [PATCH] cachefiles: use private mounts in cache->mnt Christian Brauner
2021-04-06 9:12 ` David Howells
2021-04-06 9:49 ` Christian Brauner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).