Linux-i2c Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	andi.shyti@kernel.org, jszhang@kernel.org,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	guoren@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add I2C support on TH1520
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:07:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b7f9c68-32da-405f-add3-33e542406345@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426-patchy-grievance-e7103a344c82@spud>



On 4/26/24 4:42 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/24 6:35 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:21:31 +0200, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
>>>>> This adds I2C support in the device tree of the T-Head TH1520 RISCV-SoC
>>>>> and a default configuration for the BeagleV-Ahead. It appears that the
>>>>> TH1520 I2C is already supported in the upstream kernel through the
>>>>> Synopsis Designware I2C adapter driver.
>>>>> As there is no clock driver for this board as of today, this patch
>>>>> series uses a fixed-clock named i2c_ic_clk.
>>>>> There is also no pinctrl driver yet so pinmux must be handled manually
>>>>> for now.
>>>>> It also fixes the order of the nodes in the device tree to comply with
>>>>> device-tree coding-style.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas Bonnefille (4):
>>>>>     dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Document compatible thead,th1520-i2c
>>>>>     riscv: boot: dts: thead: Fix node ordering in TH1520 device tree
>>>>>     riscv: dts: thead: Add TH1520 I2C nodes
>>>>>     riscv: dts: thead: Enable I2C on the BeagleV-Ahead
>>>>>
>>>>>    .../bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml     |  12 ++
>>>>>    .../boot/dts/thead/th1520-beaglev-ahead.dts   |  22 ++++
>>>>>    arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi         | 120 ++++++++++++++----
>>>>>    3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.44.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
>>>> series.
>>>>
>>>> Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
>>>> are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
>>>> maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
>>>> unless the platform maintainer has comments.
>>>>
>>>> If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
>>>> make sure dt-schema is up to date:
>>>>
>>>>     pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y thead/th1520-beaglev-ahead.dtb' for 20240425082138.374445-1-thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com:
>>>>
>>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520-beaglev-ahead.dtb: i2c-clock: clock-frequency:0:0: 50000000 is greater than the maximum of 5000000
>>>
>>> The bot is not freaking out here, 50 MHz is indeed more than 5 MHz :)
>>
>> 5MHz is the maximum clock-frequency, ie. the I2C bus frequency.
>> This is actually set to 100kHz for I2C0 in the DT:
>>
>> &i2c0 {
>>      status = "okay";
>>      clock-frequency = <100000>; <----
>> ...
>> };
>>
>> 50MHz is the "fixed-clock" frequency, that is the clock feeding the I2C
>> IP block:
>>
>> i2c_ic_clk: i2c-clock {
>>      compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>      clock-frequency = <50000000>; <-----
>>      #clock-cells = <0>;
>> };
>>
>> My guess is that the bot confused the clock-frequency parameter for the bus
>> clock (SCL) with the i2c-ic-clock value for the controller itself during the
>> checks.
>>
>> Do you agree with this or am I misunderstanding the error ?
>>
>> If I lower the fixed-clock frequency to eg. 100kHz, the error is gone. But I
>> guess the 5MHz limit should probably not apply to the input clock?
> 
> Heh, I know why that's happening - it's your node name.
> The pattern for i2c controllers is "^i2c(@.*)?":
> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml
> 
> Rob co-incidentally (or maybe not) put out a patch for fixed-frequency
> clock names, suggesting using clock as a prefix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240425183810.3079069-1-robh@kernel.org/
> If we switched to that format, I believe your problem goes away.
> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.
> 

Indeed it was the node name, when I switched the name of the fixed clock 
to clock-i2c-ic, the error was gone, thank you. :)
But i2c_ic_clk shouldn't match "^i2c(@.*)?", one of my teammates 
suggested that the error may instead come from this line 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/scripts/dtc/checks.c#L1023.

But as Drew is working on new iterations of the TH1520's clock driver I 
will just delete this fixed clock and publish a second version depending 
on his patch.

Thank you,
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25  8:21 [PATCH 0/4] Add I2C support on TH1520 Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-25  8:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Document compatible thead,th1520-i2c Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-25  9:48   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-25  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] riscv: boot: dts: thead: Fix node ordering in TH1520 device tree Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-25  9:49   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-25 16:39     ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-25  8:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] riscv: dts: thead: Add TH1520 I2C nodes Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-29 13:35   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2024-04-25  8:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] riscv: dts: thead: Enable I2C on the BeagleV-Ahead Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-29 13:38   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2024-04-25  9:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add I2C support on TH1520 Conor Dooley
2024-04-25  9:42   ` Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-25 15:10   ` Drew Fustini
2024-04-25 14:51 ` Rob Herring
2024-04-25 16:35   ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-26 14:12     ` Thomas Bonnefille
2024-04-26 14:42       ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-29 13:07         ` Thomas Bonnefille [this message]
2024-04-29 13:24           ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-25 16:37 ` (subset) " Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b7f9c68-32da-405f-add3-33e542406345@bootlin.com \
    --to=thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).