From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
bhelgaas@google.com, lukas@wunner.de,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI/cxl: Move PCI CXL vendor Id to a common location from CXL subsystem
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:01:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240409160256.94184-2-dave.jiang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409160256.94184-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Move PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL in CXL private code to PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL in
pci_ids.h in order to be utilized in PCI subsystem.
The response Bjorn received from the PCI SIG was "1E98h is not a VID in our
system, but 1E98 has already been reserved by CXL." He suggested "we should
add '#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL 0x1e98' so that if we ever *do* see such an
assignment, we'll be more likely to flag it as an issue.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240402172323.GA1818777@bhelgaas/
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
---
drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 6 +++---
drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 2 +-
drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 1 -
drivers/cxl/pci.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 2 +-
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 ++
6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
index 0df09bd79408..c496a9710d62 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
__le32 response[2];
int rc;
- rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
+ rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
&request, sizeof(request),
&response, sizeof(response));
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
__le32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle);
int rc;
- rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
+ rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
&request, sizeof(request),
rsp, sizeof(*rsp) + remaining);
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
if (!pdev)
return;
- doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
+ doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS);
if (!doe_mb) {
dev_dbg(dev, "No CDAT mailbox\n");
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
index 372786f80955..da52fc9e234b 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int cxl_find_regblock_instance(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
.resource = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE,
};
- regloc = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
+ regloc = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
CXL_DVSEC_REG_LOCATOR);
if (!regloc)
return -ENXIO;
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
index 93992a1c8eec..4da07727ab9c 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
+++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
* "DVSEC" redundancies removed. When obvious, abbreviations may be used.
*/
#define PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(31, 20)
-#define PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL 0x1E98
/* CXL 2.0 8.1.3: PCIe DVSEC for CXL Device */
#define CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE 0
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
index 2ff361e756d6..110478573296 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
cxlds->rcd = is_cxl_restricted(pdev);
cxlds->serial = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
cxlds->cxl_dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(
- pdev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL, CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE);
+ pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL, CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE);
if (!cxlds->cxl_dvsec)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
"Device DVSEC not present, skip CXL.mem init\n");
diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
index 308c9969642e..a1b742b1a735 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static ssize_t cxl_pmu_event_sysfs_show(struct device *dev,
/* For CXL spec defined events */
#define CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(_name, _gid, _msk) \
- CXL_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(_name, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL, _gid, _msk)
+ CXL_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(_name, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL, _gid, _msk)
static struct attribute *cxl_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(clock_ticks, CXL_PMU_GID_CLOCK_TICKS, BIT(0)),
diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
index a0c75e467df3..7dfbf6d96b3d 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
@@ -2607,6 +2607,8 @@
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA 0x1ded
+#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL 0x1e98
+
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEHUTI 0x1fc9
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TEHUTI_3009 0x3009
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TEHUTI_3010 0x3010
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 16:01 [PATCH 0/4 v4] PCI: Add Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) support for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-09 16:01 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2024-04-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI/cxl: Move PCI CXL vendor Id to a common location from CXL subsystem Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 22:51 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset Dave Jiang
2024-04-09 21:39 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 21:56 ` Dave Jiang
2024-04-11 2:33 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 22:56 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: Create new reset method to force SBR for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-26 19:46 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-27 6:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-27 17:07 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] cxl: Add post reset warning if reset results in loss of previously committed HDM decoders Dave Jiang
2024-04-26 20:03 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240409160256.94184-2-dave.jiang@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).